Cited by 39Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Learning in Education

Building Patient Relationships: A Smartphone Application Supporting Communication Between Teenagers With Asthma and the RN Care Coordinator

HAZE, KIMBERLY A., LYNAUGH, JILLIAN·2013·CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing

Abstract

Smartphone applications used in healthcare are emerging as an adjunct therapy to assist patients in self-management. Often, smartphone technology is not integrated into healthcare delivery and does not build the nurse-patient relationship, an essential mechanism to guide the patient toward health. In a pilot study using smartphones with teenagers with asthma, the application provided a method not only to share health information at the point-of-living, including health assessments, personalized health plans, and disease information, but also to allow text messaging communication between the teenager and his/her RN care coordinator. Twenty-five teenagers piloted the smartphone application and provided feedback about its use. Eighty-five percent of the teenagers responding to the end-of-pilot, semistructured interview indicated a positive change in the nurse-patient relationship. Teenagers perceived that they could ask more questions along with having improved access and quicker response times. The RN care coordinators perceived improved ability to contact teenagers and improved accuracy of assessment data. Although the pilot had several limitations, it demonstrates that smartphone technology and text messaging can further the nurse-patient relationship. For this to occur, nurses need to become involved in the development and integration of technology to focus applications on innovative ways to enhance communication in patient care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nxn.0b013e318295e5ba

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HAZE, K. A., & LYNAUGH, J.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing
Published
2013-06
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
266-271
ISSN
1538-2931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973896896
Cited by
39
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CIN Computers Informatics Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
Keywords
mobile application, nurse-patient relationship, asthma, adolescents, text messaging, self-management, care coordination, health data sharing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Asthma, Education, Continuing, Humans, Nurse-Patient Relations, Pilot Projects, Self Care, Cell Phone, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review