Cited by 20Reproductive tract infections researchHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

The role of behavioral counseling in sexually transmitted disease prevention program settings.

Open access
Brookmeyer, Kathryn A., Hogben, Matthew, Kinsey, Jennine·2016·Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Behavioral counseling for sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention is recommended for persons at risk, and the body of evidence yields numerous interventions that have STD preventive efficacy. What is needed is a review of the subset of these interventions that could be feasible in clinical settings, especially settings in STD prevention programs. METHODS: We reviewed existing systematic reviews of the literature and abstracted from them studies that fit the following criteria in that the interventions: (1) used no more than 60 minutes of contact time in 1 to 2 sessions, (2) were individual level and face to face, (3) took place in a clinical setting, (4) had STD outcomes available, (5) were based in the United States, (6) were peer reviewed, and (7) had a control group. RESULTS: From 6 reviews (published 2006-2014) covering 91 studies, we found 13 analyses representing 11 intervention studies that fit the selection criteria. Of these 13, 5 returned lower STD rates in the intervention group at follow-up; one study reported a higher rate of STD in one subset of the intervention group (men who have sex with men). Studies with effects on STD at follow-up were quite similar to studies across populations, settings, and follow-up periods, although successful interventions were more likely to demonstrate behavioral effects as well (5/5 vs. 2/5 among 10 interventions measuring behavior change). CONCLUSIONS: Counseling is likely to benefit some STD clinic attendees, although unlikely to benefit men who have sex with men. The balance of costs and benefits of implementing behavioral counseling in STD programs is unclear, but feasibility would be improved if behavioral counseling were implemented in the context of other prevention efforts. Because populations outside typical STD clinic settings could also benefit, programs may exercise a valuable role through partnerships.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/olq.0000000000000327

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A review of 11 studies reported that brief prevention messages delivered by providers and health counselors are feasible and decrease subsequent STIs in STD clinic and HIV care settings.

    “A review of 11 studies evaluated brief prevention messages delivered by providers and health counselors and reported them to be feasible and to decrease subsequent STIs in STD clinic settings (7) and HIV care settings (8).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Methods report 13 articles representing 11 studies, including seven studies with STD-clinic settings. The Results report lower STD rates at follow-up in only five analyses; the remaining eight found no difference, so the sentence overstates the evidence for reduced subsequent STIs. The Discussion considers these short interventions feasible to deliver, but the abstract Conclusions say the balance of implementation costs and benefits is unclear. HIV-care settings are attached to citation (8), not this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [8]O’Connor EA Lin JS Burda BU Henderson JT Walsh ES Whitlock EP Behavioral counseling to prevent sexually transmitted infections: A systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med 2014 161 874 883 25243895
  2. [31]Bandura A Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory 1986 Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brookmeyer, K. A., Hogben, M., & Kinsey, J.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Brookmeyer, Kathryn A.
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Published
2016-02
Volume
43
Issue
2S
Pages
S102-S112
ISSN
0148-5717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2514925515
Cited by
20
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
behavioral counseling, STD prevention, STD clinic attendees, brief counseling intervention, behavior change, men who have sex with men, intervention feasibility
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Humans, Mass Screening, Sexual Partners, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Contact Tracing, Treatment Outcome, Directive Counseling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review