Cited by 92HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskReproductive tract infections research

New human immunodeficiency virus diagnosis independently associated with rectal gonorrhea and chlamydia in men who have sex with men.

Open access
Barbee, Lindley A., Khosropour, Christine M., Dombrowksi, Julia C., Golden, Matthew R.·2017·Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rectal sexually transmitted infections (STI) have been associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) diagnosis, but inferring a causal association requires disentangling them from receptive anal intercourse (RAI). METHODS: We conducted a stratified case-control study by frequency matching 4 controls to each case within year using clinical data from men who have sex with men (MSM) attending the Seattle STD Clinic 2001 to 2014. Cases were MSM with a new HIV diagnosis and negative HIV test at 12 months or less. Controls were HIV-negative MSM. All included men had rectal STI testing, tested negative for syphilis, and had complete sexual behavior data. We categorized men by RAI: (1) none; (2) condoms for all RAI; (3) condomless RAI only with HIV-negative partners; and (4) condomless RAI with HIV-positive or unknown-status partners. We created 3 logistic regression models: (1) 3 univariate models of concurrent rectal gonorrhea, rectal chlamydia, and rectal STI in 12 months or less with new HIV diagnosis; (2) those 3 infections, plus age, race, year, number of sexual partners in 2 months or less, and methamphetamine use; and (3) model 2 with RAI categories. We calculated the population attributable risk of rectal STI on HIV diagnoses. RESULTS: Among 176 cases and 704 controls, rectal gonorrhea, chlamydia and rectal STI in 12 months or less were associated with HIV diagnosis. The magnitude of these associations attenuated in the second model, but persisted in model 3 (gonorrhea: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-3.8; chlamydia: aOR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.3; prior STI: aOR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.5-6.2). One in 7 HIV diagnoses can be attributed to rectal STI. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal STI are independently associated with HIV acquisition. These findings support the hypothesis that rectal STI play a biologically mediated causal role in HIV acquisition and support screening/treatment of STI for HIV prevention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/olq.0000000000000614

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rectal gonorrhea and chlamydia are associated with HIV infection.

    “Rectal gonorrhea and chlamydia are associated with HIV infection (82,207), and men with repeat rectal infections can be at substantially higher risk for HIV acquisition (208).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [207]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Dombrowski J Kerani R Golden M Routine CASI Increased Sexual History Completeness among MSM STD Clinic Patients CDC STD Prevention Conference Minneapolis, MN 2012

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barbee, L. A., Khosropour, C. M., Dombrowksi, J. C., & Golden, M. R.
Affiliations
Public Health – Seattle & King County (US)
Corresponding author
  • Barbee, Lindley A.
  • Khosropour, Christine M.
  • Dombrowksi, Julia C.
  • Golden, Matthew R.
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Published
2017-07
Volume
44
Issue
7
Pages
385-389
ISSN
  • 0148-5717 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4521
OpenAlex
W2607267328
Cited by
92
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K23AI113185, T32AI007140, P30AI027757)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
HIV acquisition, rectal gonorrhea, rectal chlamydia, men who have sex with men, receptive anal intercourse, condomless anal sex, HIV prevention, STI screening, population attributable risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Chlamydia Infections, Gonorrhea, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Methamphetamine, Rectal Diseases, Retrospective Studies, Sexual Partners, Urban Population, Washington, HIV Infections, Case-Control Studies, Condoms, Homosexuality, Male, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review