The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Longitudinal Predictors of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Initiation Among Adolescent Girls in a High-Risk Geographic Area
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake is low among adolescent girls in the United States. We sought to identify longitudinal predictors of HPV vaccine initiation in populations at elevated risk for cervical cancer. METHODS: We interviewed a population-based sample of parents of 10- to 18-year-old girls in areas of North Carolina with elevated cervical cancer rates. Baseline interviews occurred in summer 2007 and follow-up interviews in fall 2008. Measures included health belief model constructs. RESULTS: Parents reported that 27% (149/567) of their daughters had initiated HPV vaccine between baseline and follow-up. Of parents who at baseline intended to get their daughters the vaccine in the next year, only 38% (126/348) had done so by follow-up. Of parents of daughters who remained unvaccinated at follow-up but had seen a doctor since baseline, only 37% (122/388) received an HPV vaccine recommendation. Rates of HPV vaccine initiation were higher among parents who at baseline perceived lower barriers to getting HPV vaccine, anticipated greater regret if their daughters got HPV because they were unvaccinated, did not report "needing more information" as the main reason they had not already vaccinated, intended to get their daughters the vaccine, or were not born-again Christians. CONCLUSIONS: Missed opportunities to increase HPV vaccine uptake included unrealized parent intentions and absent doctor recommendations. While several health belief model constructs identified in early acceptability studies (e.g., perceived risk, perceived vaccine effectiveness) were not longitudinally associated with HPV vaccine initiation, our findings suggest correlates of uptake (e.g., anticipated regret) that offer novel opportunities for intervention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity
Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1990) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.3960030404 · Cited by 854
Cited by
Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action
Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Rothman, A. J., Leask, J., & Kempe, A. (2017) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100618760521 · Cited by 1,233
Self-citationProvider communication and HPV vaccination: The impact of recommendation quality
Gilkey, M. B., Calo, W. A., Moss, J. L., Shah, P. D., Marciniak, M. W., & Brewer, N. T. (2016) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.01.023 · Cited by 431
Self-citationHuman Papillomavirus Vaccine Introduction – The First Five Years
Markowitz, L. E., Tsu, V., Deeks, S. L., Cubie, H., Wang, S. A., Vicari, A. S., & Brotherton, J. M. L. (2012) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.05.039 · Cited by 364
Self-citationReiter, P. L., & McRee, A.-L. (2015) · Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care · doi:10.1136/jfprhc-2014-101004 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Brewer, N. T., Gottlieb, S. L., Reiter, P. L., McRee, A.-L., Liddon, N., Markowitz, L., & Smith, J. S.
- Venue
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 197-204
- ISSN
- 0148-5717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W9282156
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Longitudinal Predictors of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Initiation Among Adolescent Girls in a High-Risk Geographic Area. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/olq.0b013e3181f12dbf
- The paper
- Brewer, N. T., Gottlieb, S. L., Reiter, P. L., McRee, A.-L., Liddon, N., Markowitz, L., & Smith, J. S. (2011). Longitudinal Predictors of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Initiation Among Adolescent Girls in a High-Risk Geographic Area. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1097/olq.0b013e3181f12dbf
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.