Cited by 20Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthPalliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Provision of bereavement care in neonatal units in the United Kingdom*

Robertson, Meredith J. P., Aldridge, Anne, Curley, Anna E.·2011·Pediatric Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish what bereavement care services are available in neonatal units in the United Kingdom and to establish the availability to staff (doctors, nurses, and chaplains) of bereavement education, training, communication, and multicultural support. For families who lose a baby in the neonatal period, the support they receive from hospital staff can be pivotal in their ability to cope with their grief. Hospital staff are not always trained to provide this support. Limited evidence is available regarding hospital-based bereavement care in neonatology or its impact on outcome. INTERVENTIONS: Questionnaire survey of selected doctors, nurses, and chaplains in 200 neonatal units in the United Kingdom. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We had responses from 100% of neonatal units surveyed. Of 600 individuals, 320 responded; 11% of doctors had never received any formal training in bereavement care, compared with 0.8% of nurses and 1.2% and chaplains. In addition, 31% of respondents thought the training they received was inadequate. Knowledge of grief theorists was poor. Up to 99% of units were helping parents create memories through photographs or handprints. Parents were uniformly given the chance to be with their baby at the time of death (99% overall). Siblings were encouraged to be present 71% of the time; 75% of respondents felt that information about the needs of different faith groups was available. Formal psychological support was offered to 45% of families after bereavement. CONCLUSIONS: Studies have shown that parents value clear communication, education about grieving, and demonstrated emotional support by staff. Our study has shown that there are deficiencies in staff training and education in this area. Educators must promote the inclusion of content on bereavement/end-of-life care. Additional education on cultural issues would be helpful. Managing the bereavement process well to minimize morbidity for families and healthcare providers is an important challenge for the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/pcc.0b013e3181e911e3

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robertson, M. J. P., Aldridge, A., & Curley, A. E.
Affiliations
Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB)
Venue
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Published
2011-05
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
e111-e115
ISSN
1529-7535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085444976
Cited by
20
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
neonatal unit, bereavement support, chaplaincy, end-of-life care, parental grief, psychological support for families
MeSH terms
Bereavement, Clergy, Counseling, United Kingdom, Humans, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Inservice Training, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Medical Staff, Hospital, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cultural Diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review