Cited by 375Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Assessment of guidelines for good practice in psychosocial care of mothers after stillbirth: a cohort study

Hughes, P, Turton, P, Hopper, E, Evans, CDH·2002·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Most maternity units have good practice protocols, advising that after stillbirth parents should be encouraged to see and hold their dead infant. Our aim was to assess whether adherence to these protocols is associated with measurably beneficial effects on the psychological health of mother and next-born child. This study forms part of a wider case-control study of the psychological effects of stillbirth.Methods We identified 65 women in the pregnancy after stillbirth, and enrolled matched controls for 60 of them. Outcome measures included depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic-stress disorder (PTSD) in pregnancy and 1 year after the next birth, and disorganised attachment behaviour in the next-born infant. Comparison variables included seeing and holding the stillborn infant, having a funeral, and keeping mementoes.Findings Behaviours that promote contact with the stillborn infant were associated with worse outcome. Women who had held their stillborn infant were more depressed than those who only saw the infant, while those who did not see the infant were least likely to be depressed (13 of 33, 39%, vs three of 14, 21%, vs one of 17, 6%; p=0.03). Women who had seen their stillborn infant had greater anxiety (p=0.02) and higher symptoms of PTSD than those who had not (p=0.02), and their next-born infants were more likely to show disorganised attachment behaviour (18 of 43, 42%, vs one of 12, 8%, p=0 x 04). Having a funeral and keeping mementoes were not associated with further adverse outcomes, but small numbers limited interpretation.Interpretation Our findings do not support good-practice guidelines, which state that failure to see and hold the dead child could have adverse effects on parents' mourning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09410-2

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women who hold their deceased infant have significantly higher rates of post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression even 7 years after the event.

    “It has been found that women who hold their deceased infant have significantly higher rates of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression even 7 years after the event.30,31”

    From Complicated grief after perinatal loss (2012) · cites this paper as [31]

  • A study published in 2002 showed increased maternal depression and anxiety associated with seeing and holding the deceased baby in a dose-response-like trend.

    “however, a study25 published in 2002 showed increased maternal depression and anxiety associated with seeing and holding the deceased baby in a dose-response-like trend.”
  • Parents' mental health outcomes related to making meaning/memories were documented in 29 reports and included coping, anxiety, and depression.

    “Parents’ mental health outcomes related to making meaning/memories were documented in 29 reports,17,25,53,54,58,60,63,64,69,70,76,86,89,98,103,107,110,111,116,119,121,122,127,137–139,148,149,154 and included coping, anxiety, and depression.”
  • A small number of studies (n=7) indicated that seeing the baby had positively influenced coping, while holding the baby did not.

    “Additionally, there were a small number of studies (n=7) that indicated seeing the baby had positively influenced coping, while holding the baby did not.”
  • A few studies (n=5) indicated that seeing the baby was perceived negatively, or were inconclusive (n=3) in terms of influence on parents' mental health outcomes.

    “A few studies (n=5) indicated that seeing the baby was perceived negatively,25,72,163,184,201 or were inconclusive (n=3)55,80,125 in terms of influence on parents’ mental health outcomes.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, P., Turton, P., Hopper, E., & Evans, C.
Affiliations
  • St George's Hospital (GB)
  • Rampton Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Hughes, P
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-07
Volume
360
Issue
9327
Pages
114-118
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2133400295
Cited by
375
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 24
FWCI
20.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
stillbirth, psychosocial care, maternal depression, maternal anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, disorganized attachment, good practice guidelines, bereavement, funerals
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Fetal Death, Grief, Humans, Psychosocial Deprivation, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review