Cited by 55Cerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersChildren's Physical and Motor Development

Evaluation of Lower Body Positive Pressure Supported Treadmill Training for Children With Cerebral Palsy

Kurz, Max J., Corr, Brad, Stuberg, Wayne, Volkman, Kathleen G., Smith, Nina·2011·Pediatric Physical Therapy

Abstract

In Brief Purpose: To examine the feasibility of using lower body positive pressure supported (LBPPS) treadmill training to improve the walking abilities, balance and lower extremity strength of children with cerebral palsy (CP). Methods: Nine children with CP (GMFCS II-IV) participated in LBPPS treadmill training 2 days per week for 6 weeks. Pre and post training measures of preferred walking speed, spatiotemporal kinematics, lower extremity strength, and the BESTest were used to assess potential improvements from LBPPS treadmill training. Results: LBPPS treadmill training resulted in significantly faster walking speed, less time in double support, improved overall balance, and strength of the lower extremity antigravity musculature. Conclusions: It is feasible to use LBPPS treadmill training to improve the walking performance, balance, and strength of children with CP. The authors found that the positive pressure system used to support children ambulating on a treadmill was efficacious for improving gait speed, strength, and balance, although gait speed was not increased to the level reported for other BWSTT devices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/pep.0b013e318227b737

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study reported intermittent discomfort and 'a few' skin abrasions from robotic orthosis use; these issues were resolved by adjustment of the supports.

    “One study reported intermittent discomfort and 'a few' skin abrasions from robotic orthosis use; these issues were resolved by adjustment of the supports (see Table SIV). 63”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurz, M. J., Corr, B., Stuberg, W., Volkman, K. G., & Smith, N.
Affiliations
  • Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • AlterG (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kurz, Max J.
  • Corr, Brad
Venue
Pediatric Physical Therapy
Published
2011
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
232-239
ISSN
0898-5669 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085718459
Cited by
55
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
Keywords
cerebral palsy, lower body positive pressure, treadmill training, gait training, walking speed, balance, lower limb strength, double support, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cerebral Palsy, Child, Child Welfare, Disability Evaluation, Postural Balance, Exercise Test, Exercise Therapy, Female, Gait, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Leg, Male, Pressure, Treatment Outcome, Gait Disorders, Neurologic, Physical Therapy Modalities, Muscle Strength, Muscle Strength Dynamometer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review