Cited by 110Health Policy Implementation ScienceEvaluation and Performance AssessmentCommunity Health and Development

Balancing Fidelity and Adaptation: Implementing Evidence-Based Chronic Disease Prevention Programs

Carvalho, Michelle L., Honeycutt, Sally, Escoffery, Cam, Glanz, Karen, Sabbs, Darrell, Kegler, Michelle C.·2013·Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe adaptations that community-based organizations (CBOs) made to evidence-based chronic disease prevention intervention programs and to discuss reasons for those adaptations. DESIGN: The process evaluation used project report forms, interviews, and focus groups to obtain information from organizational staff. SETTING: Programs were conducted in community-based organizations (n = 12) in rural southwest Georgia including churches, worksites, community coalitions, a senior center, and a clinical patient setting. PARTICIPANTS: Site coordinators (n = 15), organizational leaders (n = 7), and project committee members (n = 25) involved in program implementation at 12 funded organizations. INTERVENTION: The Emory Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network awarded mini grants to rural CBOs to implement one of 5 evidence-based nutrition or physical activity programs. These sites received funding and technical assistance from Emory and agreed to conduct all required elements of the selected evidence-based program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Program implementation and context were explored, including completion of core elements, program adaptation, and reasons for adaptation that occurred at sites implementing evidence-based chronic disease prevention programs. RESULTS: Five major types of adaptations were observed: changing educational materials, intended audience, and program delivery; adding new activities; and deleting core elements. Sites had intentional or unintentional reasons for making program adaptations including enhancing engagement in the program, reaching specific audiences, increasing program fit, and reinforcing program messages. Reasons for not completing core elements (program deletions) included various types of "turbulence" or competing demands (eg, leadership/staff transitions and time constraints). CONCLUSIONS: The types of adaptations and reasons described in this evaluation support the idea that adaptation is a natural element of implementing evidence-based interventions. Building this understanding into dissemination strategies may help researchers and funders better reach communities with evidence-based interventions that are a relevant fit, while striving for fidelity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/phh.0b013e31826d80eb

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carvalho, M. L., Honeycutt, S., Escoffery, C., Glanz, K., Sabbs, D., & Kegler, M. C.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Carvalho, Michelle L.
Venue
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Published
2013-07
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
348-356
ISSN
1078-4659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041172628
Cited by
110
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
10.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Public Health Management and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA163526)
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U48DP 000043, 1U48DP0010909-01-1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
Keywords
program adaptation, fidelity, evidence-based interventions, chronic disease prevention, community organizations, rural health, nutrition programs, physical activity programs, cancer prevention, implementation, dissemination, organizational context
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Community Health Services, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Focus Groups, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review