Cited by 61Pain Management and TreatmentPain Management and Placebo EffectPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Mind-Body Interventions for Treatment of Phantom Limb Pain in Persons with Amputation

Open access
Moura, Vera Lucia, Faurot, Keturah R., Gaylord, Susan A., Mann, J. Douglas, Sill, Morgan, Lynch, Chanee, Lee, Michael Y.·2012·American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Abstract

Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a significant source of chronic pain in most persons with amputation at some time in their clinical course. Pharmacologic therapies for this condition are often only moderately effective and may produce unwanted adverse effects. There is growing empirical evidence of the therapeutic effectiveness of mind-body therapies for the relief of chronic pain; therefore, an exploration of their role in relieving amputation-related chronic pain is warranted. We undertook a focused literature review on mind-body interventions for patients with amputation who experience PLP. Because of study heterogeneity, only descriptive presentations of the studies are presented. Only studies of hypnosis, imagery, and biofeedback, including visual mirror feedback, were found; studies on meditation, yoga, and tai chi/qigong were missing from the literature. Few studies of specific mind-body therapies were dedicated to management of PLP, with the exception of mirror visual therapy. Overall, studies were largely exploratory and reflect considerable variability in the application of mind-body techniques, making definitive conclusions inadvisable. Nevertheless, the weight of existing findings indicates that a mind-body approach to PLP pain management is promising and that specific methods may offer either temporary or long-term relief, either alone or in combination with conventional therapies. The authors discuss the potential for usefulness of specific mind-body therapies and the relevance of their mechanisms of action to those of PLP, including targeting cortical reorganization, autonomic nervous system deregulation, stress management, coping ability, and quality-of-life. The authors recommend more and better quality research exploring the efficacy and mechanisms of action.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/phm.0b013e3182466034

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biofeedback has been used as an adjunctive treatment in a number of pain settings with good effect, such as with orofacial pain, headache in children, phantom limb pain, and musculoskeletal pain.

    “It has been used as an adjunctive treatment in a number of pain settings with good effect, such as with orofacial pain,43 headache in children,44 phantom limb pain,45 and musculoskeletal pain.46”

    From <p>Pain and Evil: From Local Nociception to Misery Following Social Harm</p> (2020) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Results > Biofeedback section reports biofeedback treatment for phantom limb pain and some favorable outcomes: pain resolved in a case report, and sensory pain fell significantly in an uncontrolled trial. But that trial did not significantly reduce its primary pain-intensity outcome, so the unqualified description of a “good effect” overstates the evidence. The passage also does not establish that biofeedback was used specifically as an adjunctive treatment. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 90 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [38]Rickard JA Effects of Hypnosis in the Treatment of Residual Stump and Phantom Limb Pain dissertation Pullman, WA Washington State University 2004
  2. [53]Wickramaskera I Hypnotherapy Moss D McGrady A Davies TC Handbook for Mind-Body Medicine for Primary Care Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications, Inc 2003 151 66

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moura, V. L., Faurot, K. R., Gaylord, S. A., Mann, J. D., Sill, M., Lynch, C., & Lee, M. Y.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Moura, Vera Lucia
Venue
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Published
2012-08
Volume
91
Issue
8
Pages
701-714
ISSN
0894-9115 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001977714
Cited by
61
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (T32AT003378)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
phantom limb pain, amputation, mind-body interventions, hypnosis, imagery, biofeedback, mirror visual feedback, chronic pain management, cortical reorganization, stress management, coping, quality of life
MeSH terms
Amputation, Surgical, Humans, Phantom Limb, Mind-Body Relations, Metaphysical, Mind-Body Therapies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review