Cited by 49Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesCleft Lip and Palate ResearchReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

Simplifying the Management of Caudal Septal Deviation in Rhinoplasty

Constantine, Fadi C., Ahmad, Jamil, Geissler, Palmyra, Rohrich, Rod J.·2014·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

SUMMARY: Correction of the deviated nose poses a challenge in even the most experienced hands. Frequently, the surgeon is faced with both a functional (airway obstruction) and an aesthetic problem that must be addressed conjointly. Accurate preoperative analysis and intraoperative diagnosis are integral to good outcomes. Caudal septal deviation is frequently present in patients presenting for rhinoplasty. The authors' current graduated technique for simplifying the management of the caudally deviated septum both aesthetically and functionally is described. If there is a persistent caudal septal deviation that has not been addressed by standard maneuvers, the caudal portion of the anterior septum is resected at the osseocartilaginous junction with the anterior nasal spine and maxillary crest and then sutured back to the periosteum of the anterior nasal spine with 5-0 polydioxanone. We have found this to be a safe and effective way of addressing the caudally deviated septum in the majority of cases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0000000000000236

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A technique that removes the anterior nasal spine and sutures the caudal septum to the premaxilla does not ensure anterior nasal spine stability and may shift to its original position.

    “Such a technique does not ensure ANS stability and a shift to its original position is conceivable.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Constantine, F. C., Ahmad, J., Geissler, P., & Rohrich, R. J.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2014-09
Volume
134
Issue
3
Pages
379e-388e
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076474873
Cited by
49
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
caudal septal deviation, rhinoplasty, deviated nose, septal deviation correction, anterior nasal spine, septal resection, airway obstruction, functional and aesthetic outcomes, polydioxanone suture
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nasal Septum, Rhinoplasty, Nasal Obstruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review