The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mixed Reality with HoloLens: Where Virtual Reality Meets Augmented Reality in the Operating Room
Abstract
Summary: Virtual reality and augmented reality devices have recently been described in the surgical literature. The authors have previously explored various iterations of these devices, and although they show promise, it has become clear that virtual reality and/or augmented reality devices alone do not adequately meet the demands of surgeons. The solution may lie in a hybrid technology known as mixed reality, which merges many virtual reality and augmented realty features. Microsoft’s HoloLens, the first commercially available mixed reality device, provides surgeons intraoperative hands-free access to complex data, the real environment, and bidirectional communication. This report describes the use of HoloLens in the operating room to improve decision-making and surgical workflow. The pace of mixed reality–related technological development will undoubtedly be rapid in the coming years, and plastic surgeons are ideally suited to both lead and benefit from this advance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Sinkin, 2016, Google Glass in the operating room: The plastic surgeon’s perspective., Plast Reconstr Surg, 138, 298, 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002307 · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000002307
- Davis, 2015, Looking at plastic surgery through Google Glass: Part 1. Systematic review of Google Glass evidence and the first plastic surgical procedures., Plast Reconstr Surg, 135, 918, 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001056 · DOI
- Chang, 2016, Surgical vision: Google Glass and surgery., Surg Innov, 23, 422, 10.1177/1553350616646477 · doi:10.1177/1553350616646477
- Brewer, 2016, Inheriting the learner’s view: A Google Glass-based wearable computing platform for improving surgical trainee performance., J Surg Educ, 73, 682, 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.02.005 · DOI
- Mitrasinovic, 2015, Clinical and surgical applications of smart glasses., Technol Health Care, 23, 381, 10.3233/THC-150910 · DOI · Paper page
- South, May 4, 2015, Brain surgery with Oculus Rift., VRExperience
Cited by
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Today and Tomorrow
Briganti, G., & Le Moine, O. (2020) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.00027 · Cited by 743
Morimoto, T., Kobayashi, T., Hirata, H., Otani, K., Sugimoto, M., Tsukamoto, M., Yoshihara, T., Ueno, M., & Mawatari, M. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11020470 · Cited by 281
Lungu, A. J., Swinkels, W., Claesen, L., Tu, P., Egger, J., & Chen, X. (2021) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1080/17434440.2021.1860750 · Cited by 269
Virtual Reality in Medical Students’ Education: Scoping Review
Jiang, H., Vimalesvaran, S., Wang, J. K., Lim, K. B., Mogali, S. R., & Car, L. T. (2022) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/34860 · Cited by 259
Butt, J. (2020) · Designs · doi:10.3390/designs4030017 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Tepper, O. M., Rudy, H. L., Lefkowitz, A., Weimer, K. A., Marks, S. M., Stern, C. S., & Garfein, E. S.
- Venue
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1066-1070
- ISSN
- 0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2765951333
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mixed Reality with HoloLens: Where Virtual Reality Meets Augmented Reality in the Operating Room. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/prs.0000000000003802
- The paper
- Tepper, O. M., Rudy, H. L., Lefkowitz, A., Weimer, K. A., Marks, S. M., Stern, C. S., & Garfein, E. S. (2017). Mixed Reality with HoloLens: Where Virtual Reality Meets Augmented Reality in the Operating Room. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000003802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.