Cited by 86Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesNasal Surgery and Airway Studies

Treatment of prominent and constricted ear anomalies.

Janz, Brian A., Cole, Patrick, Hollier, Larry H., Stal, Samuel·2009·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

Although the physiologic effects of ear deformity are negligible, the aesthetic and psychological impact on the patient can be profound. Significant ear malformations are prevalent in today's society and affect more than 5 percent of the population. Although the prominent ear results from either underdevelopment of the antihelix or an enlarged conchal bowl, the constricted ear is a product of helical down-folding and height deficiency. After a thorough evaluation, surgical management of the prominent ear must be approached in a careful, rational fashion. Although the surgeon may enjoy the wide latitude that hundreds of corrective techniques offer, he or she must always proceed with an algorithmic application of technique best suited to the specific auricular deformity. By using this approach, correction of the prominent ear can go beyond patient satisfaction to predictably maximize outcome in both form and symmetry. From the clinical evaluation and anatomical basis to surgical management of the deformed ear, the true art of otoplasty is in the surgeon's ability to thoroughly understand auricular structure and appropriately apply technique for maximal aesthetic outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0b013e3181aa0e9d

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ear prominence usually results from an underdeveloped antihelical fold and/or increased conchal bowl depth.

    “Ear prominence, the most common deformity, usually results from an underdeveloped antihelical fold and/or increased conchal bowl depth.5,6”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janz, B. A., Cole, P., Hollier, L. H., & Stal, S.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2009-07
Volume
124
Issue
Supplement
Pages
27e-37e
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068791289
Cited by
86
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Keywords
prominent ears, otoplasty, ear deformity, antihelix, ear symmetry, surgical technique selection
MeSH terms
Congenital Abnormalities, Child, Ear Cartilage, Ear, External, Humans, Skin Transplantation, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Ear Auricle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review