Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,873

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Breast Surgery: The BREAST-Q

Pusic, Andrea L., Klassen, Anne F., Scott, Amie M., Klok, Jennifer A., Cordeiro, Peter G., Cano, Stefan J.·2009·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measuring patient-reported outcomes has become increasingly important in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery. The objective of this study was to develop a new patient-reported outcome measure to assess the unique outcomes of breast surgery patients. METHODS: Patient interviews, focus groups, expert panels, and a literature review were used to develop a conceptual framework and a list of questionnaire items. Three procedure-specific questionnaires (augmentation, reduction, and reconstruction) were developed and cognitive debriefing interviews used to pilot each questionnaire. Revised questionnaires were field tested with 1950 women at five centers in the United States and Canada (response rate, 72 percent); 491 patients also completed a test-retest questionnaire. Rasch measurement methods were used to construct scales, and traditional psychometric analyses, following currently recommended procedures and criteria, were performed to allow for comparison with existing measures. RESULTS: The conceptual framework included six domains: satisfaction with breasts, overall outcome, and process of care, and psychosocial, physical, and sexual well-being. Independent scales were constructed for these domains. This new patient-reported outcome measure "system" (the BREAST-Q) contains three modules (augmentation, reconstruction, and reduction), each with a preoperative and postoperative version. Each scale fulfilled Rasch and traditional psychometric criteria (including person separation index 0.76 to 0.95; Cronbach's alpha 0.81 to 0.96; and test-retest reproducibility 0.73 to 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The BREAST-Q can be used to study the impact and effectiveness of breast surgery from the patient's perspective. By quantifying satisfaction and important aspects of health-related quality of life, the BREAST-Q has the potential to support advocacy, quality metrics, and an evidence-based approach to surgical practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0b013e3181aee807

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Cano, 2004, Br J Plast Surg, 57, 11, 10.1016/j.bjps.2003.08.008 · DOI
  2. Pusic, 2008, Clin Plast Surg, 35, 215, 10.1016/j.cps.2007.10.010 · DOI
  3. Lam, 2008, J Pediatr Surg, 43, 819, 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.020 · doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.020
  4. Faria, 1999, Br J Plast Surg, 52, 448, 10.1054/bjps.1999.3167 · doi:10.1054/bjps.1999.3167
  5. Reaby, 1994, Health Care Women Int, 15, 361, 10.1080/07399339409516129 · DOI
  6. Pusic, 2007, Plast Reconstr Surg, 120, 823, 10.1097/01.prs.0000278162.82906.81 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2002, Qual Life Res, 11, 193, 10.1023/A:1015291021312 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Cano, 2006, Br J Plast Surg, 59, 65
  9. Cano, 2004, J Hand Surg (Br.), 29, 477, 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.06.002 · DOI
  10. Klassen, 2009, BMC Womens Health, 9, 11, 10.1186/1472-6874-9-11 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Rasch, 1966, Br J Math Stat Psychol, 19, 49, 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1966.tb00354.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Wright, 1977, J Educ Meas, 14, 97, 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1977.tb00031.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. Andrich, 1978, Psychometrika, 43, 561, 10.1007/BF02293814 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Andrich, 1982, Educ Psychol Res, 9, 95
  15. Andrich, 2002, Stud Educ Eval, 28, 103, 10.1016/S0191-491X(02)00015-9 · DOI
  16. Hobart, 2007, Lancet Neurol, 6, 1094, 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70290-9 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Likert, 1932, Arch Psychol, 140, 5

Cited by

See all 1,873

Metadata

Authors
Pusic, A. L., Klassen, A. F., Scott, A. M., Klok, J. A., Cordeiro, P. G., & Cano, S. J.
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2009-08
Volume
124
Issue
2
Pages
345-353
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030993903
Cited by
1,873
References
5
FWCI
25.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Breast Surgery: The BREAST-Q. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/prs.0b013e3181aee807
The paper
Pusic, A. L., Klassen, A. F., Scott, A. M., Klok, J. A., Cordeiro, P. G., & Cano, S. J. (2009). Development of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Breast Surgery: The BREAST-Q. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3181aee807

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.