Cited by 54Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

Versatility of the posterior auricular flap in partial ear reconstruction

Schonauer, Fabrizio, Vuppalapati, Gunasekar, Marlino, Sergio, Santorelli, Adriano, Canta, Luigi, Molea, Guido·2010·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The posterior auricular flap alone has always been popular because of its prompt availability, its rich vascularity, and the ease of closing the donor-site defect primarily. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with partial ear defects covered with posterior auricular flaps during the period between 2002 and 2007 were reviewed. In the authors' series, posterior auricular flaps were harvested based on a simple random vascularization and tailored to reach almost any defect of the ear by a simplified and standardized approach. RESULTS: The authors propose a simple nomenclature after grouping the flaps according to skin paddle type, pedicle type, pedicle base, flap transfer method, and flap movement; they present a standardized algorithm with which to choose the flap design for a given defect from this group. CONCLUSIONS: The authors contribute three new flap designs to enhance the versatility of the posterior auricular flap. These are the superiorly and inferiorly based twisted island flaps and the posterior auricular propeller flap.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0b013e3181ec1f03

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schonauer, F., Vuppalapati, G., Marlino, S., Santorelli, A., Canta, L., & Molea, G.
Affiliations
Federico II University Hospital (IT)
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2010-10
Volume
126
Issue
4
Pages
1213-1221
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2334768761
Cited by
54
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
auricular defects, propeller flap, flap design, skin paddle
MeSH terms
Ear Deformities, Acquired, Esthetics, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Graft Rejection, Graft Survival, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Surgical Flaps, Wound Healing, Cohort Studies, Patient Satisfaction, Risk Assessment, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Ear Auricle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review