Cited by 170Breast Implant and ReconstructionBody Contouring and SurgeryAnesthesia and Pain Management

Autologous Fat Graft in Postmastectomy Pain Syndrome

Caviggioli, Fabio, Maione, Luca, Forcellini, Davide, Klinger, Francesco, Klinger, Marco·2011·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mastectomy with axillary dissection is still one of the most common procedures in oncologic surgery. Unfortunately, a condition of neuropathic pain, termed postmastectomy pain syndrome, can appear after mastectomy. Although evidence regarding the epidemiology of postmastectomy pain syndrome is well researched, an effective therapy is still unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of lipoaspirate graft in the treatment of postmastectomy pain syndrome. METHODS: From February of 2006 to August of 2008, a total of 113 patients affected by postmastectomy pain syndrome and severe scar retractions were enrolled for this clinical study. Seventy-two patients were treated with autologous fat grafted in painful scars, and 41 patients did not undergo any further surgical procedure. Pain assessment was performed using a visual analogue scale before and after treatment, with a mean follow-up of 13 months. In addition, antalgic drug intake was recorded in the 34 patients who received a surgical treatment. Results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: A significant decrease in pain according to the visual analogue scale was detected in patients treated with autologous fat graft (3.23-point reduction, p = 0.0005). Twenty-eight of 34 patients stopped their analgesic therapy with a significant follow-up (13 months). CONCLUSIONS: Autologous fat grafting is a safe, relatively noninvasive, and rapid surgical procedure. The authors' results suggest its effectiveness for treatment of postmastectomy pain syndrome. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0b013e31821e70e7

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caviggioli, F., Maione, L., Forcellini, D., Klinger, F., & Klinger, M.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2011-08
Volume
128
Issue
2
Pages
349-352
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2322524491
Cited by
170
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Breast Implant and Reconstruction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
post-mastectomy pain syndrome, autologous fat graft, lipoaspirate, scar contraction, neuropathic pain, breast cancer surgery, axillary lymph node dissection, analgesia, analgesic use
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Mastectomy, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Postoperative Pain, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Transplantation, Autologous, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review