Cited by 12Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesCardiac Health and Mental HealthMental Health Treatment and Access

Treating Anxiety in the Presence of Medical Comorbidity: Calmly Moving Forward

Open access
Rollman, Bruce L., Huffman, Jeff C.·2013·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

Patients with chronic medical conditions (CMCs) and a comorbid anxiety or mood disorder tend to report more symptoms and experience poorer treatment outcomes compared with those without mental health comorbidity. Although the benefits to be derived from treating depression in patients with CMCs have begun to be quantified, particularly among those with cardiovascular disease, our understanding of the benefits of treating anxiety in patients with CMCs is far less developed. Improving care for patients with CMCs is one of the major challenges facing medicine today because patients with multiple chronic diseases account for most health care costs. Emerging evidence indicates that integrated or "blended" collaborative care strategies that treat both the psychiatric and physical conditions together tend to produce greater improvements in mood symptoms and control of CMCs compared with programs that target the psychiatric condition alone. We review a new report, published in this issue of Psychosomatic Medicine, from the National Institutes of Mental Health-funded multisite Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management trial, that shines new attention on anxiety disorders and medical comorbidity. We place their findings in context with these new blended care models that are potentially more powerful, scalable, cost-effective, and readily delivered through existing CMC programs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/psy.0000000000000011

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rollman, B. L., & Huffman, J. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Rollman, Bruce L.
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2013-10
Volume
75
Issue
8
Pages
710-712
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030331887
Cited by
12
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL113272, R01HL114016)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH093501)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
anxiety disorders, chronic disease, comorbidities, blended care, collaborative care, integrated care, cardiovascular disease, mood disorders, treatment outcomes, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Asthma, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Male, Migraine Disorders, Primary Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review