Cited by 8HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

Impact of immediate initiation of antiretroviral therapy on HIV patient satisfaction

Ogbuoji, Osondu, Geldsetzer, Pascal, Wong, Cebele, Khan, Shaukat, Mafara, Emma, Lejeune, Charlotte, Walsh, Fiona, Okello, Velephi +1 more·2020·AIDS

Abstract

Objectives: Immediate ART (or early access to ART for all, EAAA) is becoming a national policy in many countries in sub-Saharan Africa. It is plausible that the switch from delayed to immediate ART could either increase or decrease patient satisfaction with treatment. A decrease in patient satisfaction would likely have detrimental consequences for long-term retention and adherence, in addition to the value lost because of the worsening patient experience itself. We conducted a pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial (SW-cRCT) to determine the causal impact of immediate treatment for HIV on patient satisfaction. Design: This seven-step SW-cRCT took place in 14 public-sector health facilities in Eswatini's Hhohho region, from September 2014 to August 2017. Methods: During each step of the trial, we randomly selected days for data collection at each study facility. During these days, a random sample of HIV patients were selected for outcome assessment. In total, 2629 patients provided data on their overall patient satisfaction and satisfaction with the following four domains of the patient experience using a five-point Likert scale: wait time, consultation time, involvement in treatment decisions, and respectful treatment. Higher values on the Likert scale indicated lower patient satisfaction. We analyzed the data using a multilevel ordered logistic regression model with individuals at the first level and health facilities at the second (cluster) level. Results: The proportional odds ratio (OR) comparing EAAA to control was 0.91 (95% CI 0.66–1.25) for overall patient satisfaction. For the specific domains of the patient experience, the ORs describing the impact of EAAA on satisfaction were 1.04 (95% CI 0.61–1.78) for wait time, 0.90 (95% CI 0.62–1.31) for involvement in treatment decisions, 0.86 (95% CI 0.61–1.20) for consultation time, and 1.35 (95% CI 0.93–1.96) for respectful treatment. These results were robust across a wide range of sensitivity analyses. Over time – and independent of EAAA – we observed a worsening trend for both overall patient satisfaction and satisfaction in the four domains of the patient experience we measured. Conclusion: Our findings support the policy change from delayed to immediate ART in sub-Saharan Africa. Immediate (versus delayed) ART in public-sector health facilities in Eswatini had no effect on either overall patient satisfaction or satisfaction with four specific domains of the patient experience. At the same time, we observed a strong secular trend of decreasing patient satisfaction in both the intervention and the control arm of the trial. Further implementation research should identify approaches to ensure high patient satisfaction as ART programs grow and mature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/qad.0000000000002392

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The stepped-wedge design in Ogbuoji et al. 2019 allowed phased implementation of the EAAA strategy, ensuring all facilities eventually received the intervention while enabling rigorous evaluation of its impact on patient satisfaction.

    “To allow phased implementation of the EAAA strategy, ensuring all facilities eventually received the intervention while enabling rigorous evaluation of its impact on patient satisfaction”
  • The study in Ogbuoji et al. 2019 was powered to detect significant differences in patient satisfaction with a sample size of approximately 187 patients per step (14 clusters × 13.36 patients per cluster).

    “The study was powered to detect significant differences in patient satisfaction with a sample size of approximately 187 patients per step (14 clusters × 13.36 patients per cluster)”
  • 14 healthcare facilities in Ogbuoji et al. 2019 were randomized into pairs and then randomized to transition from the standard of care to the EAAA strategy at different time points, with two facilities transitioning every four months.

    “14 healthcare facilities were randomized into pairs and then randomized to transition from the standard of care to the EAAA strategy at different time points, with two facilities transitioning every four months”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ogbuoji, O., Geldsetzer, P., Wong, C., Khan, S., Mafara, E., Lejeune, C., Walsh, F., Okello, V., & Bärnighausen, T.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Clinton Health Access Initiative (US)
  • Ministry of Health (SZ)
Corresponding author
Ogbuoji, Osondu
Venue
AIDS
Published
2020-02-01
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
267-276
ISSN
  • 0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-5571
OpenAlex
W2981219143
Cited by
8
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AIDS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
immediate antiretroviral therapy, HIV, patient satisfaction, patient experience, waiting time, consultation time, patient involvement in treatment decisions, respectful treatment, public sector health facilities, Swaziland, sub-Saharan Africa, health policy change, retention in care, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Eswatini, Time Factors, HIV Infections, Logistic Models, Patient Satisfaction, Public Sector, Anti-HIV Agents, Viral Load, Early Medical Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review