Cited by 10Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentVector-borne infectious diseasesHistorical Medical Research and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deciphering the serological response to syphilis treatment in men living with HIV

Abstract

Objective To examine syphilis serology after treatment in people living with HIV. No unanimous guidelines exist in the era of increasing coinfection. Design Retrospective review using a tertiary care clinic in Toronto from 2000 to 2017. Methods The 2015 Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention syphilis guidelines were used to define an adequate serologic response. Cumulative distribution estimates and proportional hazards models accounting for interval censoring estimated the time to serologic response and seroreversion. Multistate models were used to investigate extended periods of serofast serology. Results A total of 171 patients with syphilis met our inclusion criteria (16 primary, 53 secondary, 26 early latent, 46 late latent, 30 neurosyphilis). Serologic response was achieved by 12 months for 65 (94%) patients and by 12-18 months for four (6%) patients with primary/secondary syphilis. For latent and neurosyphilis, 94 (92%) achieved serologic response by 24 months and one (1%) at 24.1 months. 84 (49%) patients achieved seroreversion with a median (95% confidence interval) time of 2 (1.44, 2.68) years. Latent syphilis was associated with a lower likelihood of achieving serologic response [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.52, P = 0.05] and seroreversion (HR = 0.27, P Conclusion The majority of people living with HIV infected with syphilis will achieve an adequate serologic response as per the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention guidelines. Seroreversion was observed in abo…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/qad.0000000000002656

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Burchell, 2013, Extremely high risk of syphilis co-infection and re-diagnosis among men who have sex with men living with HIV in Ontario, Canada, Sex Transm Infect, 89, A214, 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051184.0668 · DOI
  2. Janier, 2014, 2014 European guideline on the management of syphilis, J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 28, 1, 10.1111/jdv.12734 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 1982, Treatment guidelines for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 31, 33S
  4. Guinan, 1987, Treatment of primary and secondary syphilis: defining failure at three- and six- month follow-up, JAMA, 257, 359, 10.1001/jama.1987.03390030089027 · DOI
  5. Brown, 1985, Serological response to syphilis treatment. A new analysis of old data, JAMA, 253, 1296, 10.1001/jama.1985.03350330094030 · DOI
  6. Fay, 2010, Exact and asymptotic weighted logrank tests for interval censored data: the interval R package, J Stat Softw, 36, 1, 10.18637/jss.v036.i02 · DOI
  7. Anderson-Bergman, 2017, icenReg: regression models for interval censored data in R, J Stat Softw, 81, 1, 10.18637/jss.v081.i12 · DOI
  8. Jackson, 2011, Multistate models for panel data: the msm package for R, J Stat Softw, 38, 1, 10.18637/jss.v038.i08 · DOI
  9. Workowski, 2006, Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, MMWR Recomm Rep, 55, 1
  10. Jin, 2005, Epidemic syphilis among homosexually active men in Sydney, Med J Aust, 183, 172, 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb06989.x · DOI
  11. Spagnuolo, 2018, Incidence and predictors of serological treatment response in early and late syphilis among people living with HIV, Open Forum Infect Dis, 6, ofy324, 10.1093/ofid/ofy324 · DOI
  12. Rolfs, 1997, A randomized trial of enhanced therapy for early syphilis in patients with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection. The Syphilis and HIV Study Group, N Engl J Med, 337, 307, 10.1056/NEJM199707313370504 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Malone, 1995, Syphilis and neurosyphilis in a human immunodeficiency virus type-1 seropositive population: evidence for frequent serologic relapse after therapy, Am J Med, 99, 55, 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)80105-3 · DOI
  14. Wu, 2014, Spirochetemia due to Treponema pallidum using polymerase-chain-reaction assays in patients with early syphilis: prevalence, associated factors and treatment response, Clin Microbiol and Infect, 20, O524, 10.1111/1469-0691.12504 · DOI
  15. Tittes, 2013, Enhanced therapy for primary and secondary syphilis: a longitudinal retrospective analysis of cure rates and associated factors, Int J STD AIDS, 24, 703, 10.1177/0956462413480721 · DOI
  16. Farhi, 2009, Clinical and serologic baseline and follow-up features of syphilis according to HIV status in the post-HAART era, Medicine (Baltimore), 88, 331, 10.1097/MD.0b013e3181c2af86 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Andrade, 2017, Single dose versus 3 doses of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for early syphilis in HIV: a randomized clinical trial, Clin Infect Dis, 64, 759, 10.1093/cid/ciw862 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ghanem, 2008, Antiretroviral therapy is associated with reduced serologic failure rates for syphilis among HIV-infected patients, Clin Infect Dis, 47, 258, 10.1086/589295 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Jinno, 2013, Predictors of serological failure after treatment in HIV-infected patients with early syphilis in the emerging era of universal antiretroviral therapy use, BMC Infect Dis, 13, 605, 10.1186/1471-2334-13-605 · DOI
  20. Knaute, 2012, Serological response to treatment of syphilis according to disease stage and HIV status, Clin Infect Dis, 55, 1615, 10.1093/cid/cis757 · DOI
  21. González-López, 2009, Factors determining serologic response to treatment in patients with syphilis, Clin Infect Dis, 49, 1505, 10.1086/644618 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Zetola, 2007, Syphilis and HIV infection: an update, Clin Infect Dis, 44, 1222, 10.1086/513427 · DOI
  23. Sena, 2015, A systematic review of syphilis serological treatment outcomes in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected persons: rethinking the significance of serological nonresponsiveness and the serofast state after therapy, BMC Infect Dis, 15, 479, 10.1186/s12879-015-1209-0 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 10

Metadata

Authors
Ren, M., Szadkowski, L., & Walmsley, S. L.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Biostatistical Research Unit
Corresponding author
  • Ren, Melody
  • Szadkowski, Leah
Venue
AIDS
Published
2020-08-08
Volume
34
Issue
14
Pages
2089-2096
ISSN
  • 0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-5571
OpenAlex
W3048508055
Cited by
10
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AIDS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Historical Medical Research and Treatments
Keywords
syphilis, HIV coinfection, serological response, seroreversion, latent syphilis, neurosyphilis, syphilis treatment, multi-state models
MeSH terms
Adult, Canada, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neurosyphilis, Penicillin G Benzathine, Retrospective Studies, Syphilis, Syphilis Serodiagnosis, HIV Infections, Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active, Coinfection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review