Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 352

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of HIV infection in adults: the first 4 years

Nelson, Mark R, Katlama, Christine, Montaner, Julio S, Cooper, David A, Gazzard, Brian, Clotet, Bonaventura, Lazzarin, Adriano, Schewe, Knud, Lange, Joep, Wyatt, Christina, Curtis, Sue, Chen, Shan-Shan, Smith, Stephen, Bischofberger, Norbert, Rooney, James F·2007·AIDS

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the safety profile of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF) for the treatment of HIV infection in adults over the first 4 years of use. METHODS: A tenofovir DF expanded access program (EAP) was initiated in 2001; safety data were examined from this program and from the manufacturer's database, which contained reports of all postmarketing adverse drug reactions received up to 30 April 2005. Specific analyses were performed to characterize the renal safety of tenofovir DF. RESULTS: The EAP enrolled 10 343 patients; serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 631 (6%). A renal SAE of any type was observed in 0.5% of patients, and graded elevations in serum creatinine occurred in 2.2% of the patients evaluated. In a multivariate analysis, baseline risk factors for the development of increased serum creatinine on-study were elevated serum creatinine, concomitant nephrotoxic medications, low body weight, advanced age, and lower CD4 cell count. For postmarketing safety data (455 392 person-years of exposure to tenofovir DF) the most commonly reported serious adverse drug reactions were renal events, with a distribution by type similar to that observed in the EAP. Bone abnormalities were infrequently reported in either the EAP or the postmarketing safety databases. No new unexpected toxicities were identified in postmarketing safety surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrate a favorable safety profile for tenofovir DF in the treatment of adults with HIV infection. Risk factors for development of nephrotoxicity can be identified and may be useful in managing those patients at greatest risk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/qad.0b013e3280b07b33

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 352

Metadata

Authors
Nelson, M. R., Katlama, C., Montaner, J. S., Cooper, D. A., Gazzard, B., Clotet, B., Lazzarin, A., Schewe, K., Lange, J., Wyatt, C., Curtis, S., Chen, S.-S., Smith, S., Bischofberger, N., & Rooney, J. F.
Venue
AIDS
Published
2007-06
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
1273-1281
ISSN
0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005270107
Cited by
352
References
2
FWCI
16.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of HIV infection in adults: the first 4 years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/qad.0b013e3280b07b33
The paper
Nelson, M. R., Katlama, C., Montaner, J. S., Cooper, D. A., Gazzard, B., Clotet, B., Lazzarin, A., Schewe, K., Lange, J., Wyatt, C., Curtis, S., Chen, S.-S., Smith, S., Bischofberger, N., & Rooney, J. F. (2007). The safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of HIV infection in adults: the first 4 years. AIDS. https://doi.org/10.1097/qad.0b013e3280b07b33

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.