Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 702

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive dysfunction in HIV patients despite long-standing suppression of viremia

Open access
Simioni, Samanta, Cavassini, Matthias, Annoni, Jean-Marie, Rimbault Abraham, Aline, Bourquin, Isabelle, Schiffer, Véronique, Calmy, Alexandra, Chave, Jean-Philippe, Giacobini, Ezio, Hirschel, Bernard, Du Pasquier, Renaud A·2010·AIDS

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of cognitive complaints and HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HANDs) in a cohort of aviremic HIV-positive patients. To evaluate the relevance of the HIV dementia scale to detect HANDs. DESIGN: Assessment of HANDs with neuropsychological tests. METHODS: Two hundred HIV-infected patients with undetectable HIV-1 RNA concentrations in the plasma, no history of major opportunistic infection of the central nervous system in the past 3 years, no current use of intravenous drugs, and no major depression answered a questionnaire designed to elicit cognitive complaints. Cognitive functions of 50 complaining and 50 noncomplaining HIV-positive patients were assessed. RESULTS: Patients had undetectable HIV-1 RNA concentrations for a median time of 48 months (range 3.2-136.6). The prevalence of cognitive complaints was 27%. The prevalence of HANDs was 84% among patients with cognitive complaints (asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment 24%, mild neurocognitive disorders 52%, and HIV-associated dementia 8%) and 64% among noncomplainers (asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment 60%, mild neurocognitive disorders 4%, and HIV-associated dementia 0%; P < 0.001). A score of 14 points or less on the HIV dementia scale yielded a positive predictive value of HANDs of 92% in complainers and 82% in noncomplainers. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of HANDs is high even in long-standing aviremic HIV-positive patients. However, HANDs without functional repercussion in daily life (asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment) is the most frequent subtype observed. In this population, the HIV dementia scale with a cutoff of 14 points or less seems to provide a useful tool to screen for the presence of HANDs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/qad.0b013e3283354a7b

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 702

Metadata

Authors
Simioni, S., Cavassini, M., Annoni, J.-M., Rimbault Abraham, A., Bourquin, I., Schiffer, V., Calmy, A., Chave, J.-P., Giacobini, E., Hirschel, B., & Du Pasquier, R. A.
Venue
AIDS
Published
2010-06-01
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
1243-1250
ISSN
0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981473511
Cited by
702
References
5
FWCI
17.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive dysfunction in HIV patients despite long-standing suppression of viremia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/qad.0b013e3283354a7b
The paper
Simioni, S., Cavassini, M., Annoni, J.-M., Rimbault Abraham, A., Bourquin, I., Schiffer, V., Calmy, A., Chave, J.-P., Giacobini, E., Hirschel, B., & Du Pasquier, R. A. (2010). Cognitive dysfunction in HIV patients despite long-standing suppression of viremia. AIDS. https://doi.org/10.1097/qad.0b013e3283354a7b

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.