Cited by 56Viral-associated cancers and disordersLymphadenopathy Diagnosis and AnalysisHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments

Accuracy of Clinical Suspicion and Pathologic Diagnosis of Kaposi Sarcoma in East Africa

Open access
Amerson, Erin, Woodruff, Carina Martin, Forrestel, Amy, Wenger, Megan, McCalmont, Timothy, LeBoit, Philip, Maurer, Toby, Laker-Oketta, Miriam +6 more·2016·JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is one of the most common malignancies in sub-Saharan Africa. The diagnosis is often based on clinical suspicion, without histopathologic confirmation. When biopsies are performed, the accuracy of interpretation by local pathologists is poorly understood. We assessed the accuracy of clinical suspicion and pathologic diagnosis of KS in 2 East African countries. METHODS: At 2 large HIV care sites in Uganda and Kenya, we evaluated consecutive biopsies performed from October 2008 to January 2013 on HIV-infected adults with clinically suspected KS. Biopsies were interpreted by both local African pathologists and a group of US-based dermatopathologists from a high volume medical center. For the purpose of this analysis, the US-based dermatopathologist interpretation was used as the gold standard. Positive predictive value was used to characterize accuracy of local African clinical suspicion of KS, and concordance, sensitivity, and specificity were used to characterize accuracy of local pathologic diagnosis. RESULTS: Among 1106 biopsies, the positive predictive value of clinical suspicion of KS was 77% (95% confidence interval: 74% to 79%). When KS was not histopathologically diagnosed, clinically banal conditions were found in 35%, medically significant disorders which required different therapy in 59% and life-threatening diseases in 6%. Concordance between African pathologists and US-based dermatopathologists was 69% (95% confidence interval: 66% to 72%). Sensitivity and specificity of African pathologic diagnoses were 68% and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among East African HIV-infected patients, we found suboptimal positive predictive value of clinical suspicion of KS and specific, but not sensitive, histopathologic interpretation. The findings call for abandonment of isolated clinical diagnosis of KS in the region and augmentation of local dermatopathologic services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/qai.0000000000000862

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]Asiimwe SB Laker-Oketta M Bennett JP Impact of Kaposi's sarcoma on survival in HIV-infected African adults on antiretroviral therapy. 21st Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections Boston, MA March 3-6, 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amerson, E., Woodruff, C. M., Forrestel, A., Wenger, M., McCalmont, T., LeBoit, P., Maurer, T., Laker-Oketta, M., Muyindike, W., Bwana, M., Buziba, N., Busakhala, N., Wools-Kaloustian, K., & Martin, J.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Amerson, Erin
Venue
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Published
2016-03-01
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
295-301
ISSN
1525-4135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2441978434
Cited by
56
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (D43CA153717, U54CA190153, R01CA119903)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U01AI069911, P30AI027763)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Viral-associated cancers and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Keywords
AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma, clinical suspicion, histopathological diagnosis, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value, dermatopathology, interobserver concordance, sensitivity and specificity, HIV-infected adults, East Africa, Uganda, Kenya
MeSH terms
Biopsy, Humans, Kenya, Sarcoma, Kaposi, Sensitivity and Specificity, Uganda, HIV Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review