Cited by 4Viral-associated cancers and disordersHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Evaluation of a training intervention to improve cancer care in Zimbabwe: strategies to improve kaposi sarcoma outcomes (SIKO), a prospective community-based stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial

Open access
Sabourin, Katherine R., Borok, Margaret, Mawhinney, Samantha, Matimba, Maxwell, Jaji, Francis, Fiorillo, Suzanne, Chifamba, Dickson D., Muserere, Claudios +11 more·2022·Journal of the International AIDS Society

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Most Zimbabweans access medical care through tiered health systems. In 2013, HIV care was decentralized to primary care clinics; while oncology care remained centralized. Most persons in Zimbabwe with Kaposi sarcoma (KS) are diagnosed late in their disease, and the prognosis is poor. Little is known about whether educational interventions could improve KS outcomes in these settings. METHODS: Interventions to improve KS detection and management were evaluated at eight Zimbabwe primary care sites (four rural/four urban) that provided HIV care. Interventions included a standardized KS clinical evaluation tool, palliative care integration, standardized treatment and improved consultative services. Interventions were implemented between February 2013 and January 2016 using a randomized stepped-wedge cluster design. Sites were monitored for KS diagnosis rates and KS outcomes, including early diagnosis (T0 vs. T1 tumour stage), participant retention and mortality. Analyses controlled for within-clinic correlations. RESULTS: A total of 1102 persons with suspected KS (96% HIV positive) were enrolled: 47% incident (new diagnosis), 20% prevalent (previous diagnosis) and 33% determined as not KS. Early (T0) diagnosis increased post-intervention, though not significant statistically (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.48 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.66-3.79], p = 0.37). New KS diagnosis rates increased 103% (95% CI: 11-273%), p = 0.02) post-intervention; although paired with an increased odds of incorrectly diagnosing KS (aOR = 2.08 [95% CI: 0.33-3.24], p = 0.001). Post-intervention, non-significant decreases in 90-day return rates (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.69 [95% CI: 0.38-1.45], p = 0.21) and survival (aHR = 1.36 [95% CI: 0.85-2.20], p = 0.20) were estimated. CONCLUSIONS: KS training interventions at urban and rural Zimbabwe decentralized primary care clinics significantly increased overall and incorrect KS diagnosis rates, but not early KS diagnosis rates, 90-day return rates or survival.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jia2.25998

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]Ely S, Gapara M, Lammersen K, Darden J, Borok M, Hosseinipour MC, et al. Pathology External Quality Assurance Program for Kaposi's Sarcoma International Clinical Trials AMC‐067/A5264 and AMC‐066/A5263. 15th International Conference on Malignancies in AIDS and Other Acquired Immunodeficiencies (ICMAOI). Bethesda, MD; 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sabourin, K. R., Borok, M., Mawhinney, S., Matimba, M., Jaji, F., Fiorillo, S., Chifamba, D. D., Muserere, C., Mashiri, B., Bhodheni, C., Gambiza, P., Mandidewa, R., Mutimuri, M., Gudza, I., Mulvahill, M., Moore, C. M., Kutner, J. S., Simões, E. A. F., & Campbell, T. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • University of Zimbabwe (ZW)
  • Island Hospice and Healthcare Harare Zimbabwe
  • Colorado School of Public Health (US)
Corresponding author
Campbell, Thomas B.
Venue
Journal of the International AIDS Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-08
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
e25998-e25998
ISSN
1758-2652 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293511057
Cited by
4
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International AIDS Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (1RO1CA172050)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Viral-associated cancers and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
Kaposi's sarcoma, cancer care, health professions education, AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma, early diagnosis, primary health centers, palliative care integration, oncology services, patient retention, survival, Zimbabwe, clinical assessment tools, rural and urban health services
MeSH terms
Humans, Prospective Studies, Sarcoma, Kaposi, Zimbabwe, HIV Infections, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review