An internship approach to strengthen the pathway for historically underrepresented groups in health sciences research: the North Carolina diversity and inclusion pathway program
Open accessAbstract
Background: To increase engagement of historically underrepresented groups in health sciences research, we created the North Carolina Diversity and Inclusion Pathway Program (NC-DIPP). This year-long, paid internship provides undergraduate and graduate students from 2 historically Black colleges and universities an opportunity to gain real-world experience under the mentorship of expert faculty. Methods: To evaluate the early experiences with the NC-DIPP program, we conducted semi-structured interviews with interns and program leaders. Faculty mentors completed an online questionnaire to describe their experiences to date. A thematic approach was used to analyze the findings. Results: In March–April 2023, 7 of 8 interns (88%), 6 of 11 mentors (54%), and 4 of 4 program leaders (100%) participated in various evaluation components. Overall, respondents agreed about the importance of programs like NC-DIPP, which further engage historically underrepresented groups in the health sciences. Interns had positive feedback about the internship, including real-world work experience, connections to experienced mentors, and early career planning. On a scale of 1 (poor) to 10 (excellent), interns rated their experience as a median of 8.3 (range: 4.5–10.0). Mentors had favorable but slightly lower scores (median: 7.0, range: 5.0–8.0). Areas for improvement were noted, including clearer expectations, improved logistical support, and central engagement of interns across projects. Conclusions: This early evaluation of NC-DIPP was generally favorable across all stakeholder groups. By providing a long-term experience in health science research, such programs can contribute to work experience, career planning, and professional networking.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research-focused programs for underrepresented undergraduate students may influence career decisions, self-confidence, and the intentions to pursue advanced education.
“Research-focused programs for underrepresented undergraduate students may influence career decisions, self-confidence, and the intentions to pursue advanced education [12,15,17].”
From Efficacy of Early Exposure Medical Programs for Underrepresented Students: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
The Results section (“Opportunities and anticipated outputs from NC-DIPP”; page not provided) reports that the internship helped shape career plans and that one intern considered pursuing a PhD. The paper does not report an effect on self-confidence, and its participants included graduate as well as undergraduate students, so it does not establish all three outcomes specifically for undergraduates. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [4]Leggon CB. African American Males in Academic Science and Engineering. Black American Males in Higher Education: Research, Programs, and Academe ed. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2009.
- [5]Holland JM, Major DA, Orvis KA. Understanding How Peer Mentoring and Capitalization Link STEM Students to Their Majors. Career Development Quarterly. 2012; 60(4): 343– 354.
- [7]Handler A, Greenleaf R, Bozlak CT, Learning from Graduate and Undergraduate Public Health Virtual Internship Experiences with State Title V Agencies During COVID-19, Summer 2020. Maternal and child health journal. Aug 2022; 26(Suppl 1): 229– 239. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03278-1 34792684 PMC8600096 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bright, D., Hughes, S., & Muir, R. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16010170 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Efficacy of Early Exposure Medical Programs for Underrepresented Students: A Systematic Review
Jaganathan, N., Guntaka, R., Goel, V., Odo, N., Sun, Z., & Arthur, M. E. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.109396
- Authors
- Robinson, S. A., Menezes, P., Zinck, M., McCrimmon, J., Okumu, E., Ford, R. U., Esposito, M., Sivaraman, V., & Chi, B. H.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina Central University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Robinson, Seronda A.
- Venue
- JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
- Published
- 2023-10-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 2S
- Pages
- S86-S92
- ISSN
- 1525-4135 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11253698
- OpenAlex
- W4386725704
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- District of Columbia Center for AIDS Research (P30AI117970)
- Center for AIDS Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (P30 AI050410)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Keywords
- research internship, historically underrepresented groups, historically Black colleges and universities, faculty mentoring, career development, professional networking, program evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Internship and Residency, North Carolina, Pentamidine, HIV Infections, Cultural Diversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review