Cited by 24Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingBacterial Infections and VaccinesInfectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis

Advances in molecular diagnostic testing for central nervous system infections

Open access
Houlihan, Catherine F., Bharucha, Tehmina, Breuer, Judith·2019·Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Purpose of review: Central nervous system (CNS) infections present an ongoing diagnostic challenge for clinicians, with an aetiological agent remaining unidentified in the majority of cases even in high-income settings. This review summarizes developments in a range of diagnostic methods published in the past 18 months. Recent findings: Several commercial assays exist for the detection of viral, bacterial and fungal pathogens using single multiplex PCR. Multicentre validation of the Biofire FilmArray panel illustrated high sensitivity for bacterial and fungal pathogens, but poor results for Cryptococcus species detection. The development of microarray cards for bacterial CNS pathogens shows promise but requires further validation. Few developments have been made in proteomics and transcriptomics, contrasted with significant increase in the use of metagenomic (or unbiased) sequencing. Novel viruses causing CNS infection have been described using this technique but contamination, cost, expertise and turnaround time requirements remain restrictive. Finally, the development of Gene Xpert and Ultra has revolutionized tuberculosis meningitis diagnostics with newly released recommendations for their use from the WHO. Summary: Progress has been made in the clinical validation and international recommendation of PCR-based tests for CNS infections. Sequencing techniques present the most dynamic field, although significant ongoing challenges persist.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/qco.0000000000000548

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The normal CSF in these infected patients is not a sign of no infection, but rather a sign of a pathogen that has successfully employed its molecular virulence machinery to enter the CNS undetected by the initial wave of immune response.

    “The normal CSF in these infected patients is not a sign of no infection, but rather a sign of a pathogen that has successfully employed its molecular virulence machinery to enter the CNS undetected by the initial wave of immune response (32).”

    From Pathogen detection in acellular cerebrospinal fluid: diagnostic insights from a pediatric cohort in Colombia (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Introduction says many CNS infections remain undiagnosed, and the Sequencing section describes pathogens found in CSF samples from some patients previously thought to have non-infectious disorders. Neither passage addresses normal CSF findings or attributes them to pathogen virulence and evasion of an initial immune response. Searches for normal CSF and immune evasion found no passage supporting that explanation; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Houlihan, C. F., Bharucha, T., & Breuer, J.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Mahosot Hospital (LA)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Breuer, Judith
Venue
Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases
Published
2019-06
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
244-250
ISSN
  • 0951-7375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-6527
OpenAlex
W2936830133
Cited by
24
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (ACF-2015-18-026)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
Keywords
central nervous system infection, molecular diagnosis, multiplex PCR, BioFire FilmArray, metagenomic sequencing, proteomics, transcriptomics, tuberculous meningitis, GeneXpert, CNS viral infection
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Central Nervous System Infections, Fungi, Humans, Viruses, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques, Proteomics, Metagenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review