Cited by 9Ancient Egypt and ArchaeologyPaleopathology and ancient diseasesHistory of Medicine Studies

Subcutaneous packing in royal Egyptian mummies dated from 18th to 20th dynasties

Open access
Saleem, Sahar N., Hawass, Zahi·2015·Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It has been widely disseminated in the literature that subcutaneous packing, as part of mummification, was not usually done until the 21st dynasty. We aimed to study by computed tomography (CT) if subcutaneous packing was part of mummification of royal Egyptians dated to 18th to 20th dynasties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the 2- and 3-dimensional CT images of 13 royal mummies dated to circa 1550 to 1153 BC for presence of subcutaneous embalming materials. Among the studied mummies were Amenhotep III, Tutankhamun, Seti I, and Ramesses II. We reported the CT characters of any detected subcutaneous embalming materials and noted their impact on the morphology of the involved body part. We correlated the CT findings with the archeological literature. RESULTS: Computed tomographic images showed subcutaneous packing in 12 (92.3%) mummies; whereas the mummy that was previously known as "Thutmose I" showed no such evidence. Subcutaneous packing involved the faces (n = 11), necks (n = 4), torsos (n = 5), and/or extremities (n = 4) of the mummies. Subcutaneous filling materials showed variation in homogeneity and CT densities and they were likely composed of resin, bits of linen with resin, or other substances. Subcutaneous packing procedure succeeded in providing uniform full contour of the involved body regions without causing significant tissue damages. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous packing procedure was used as part of mummification of royal Ancient Egyptians dated to 18th to 20th dynasties earlier than what was believed in archaeology. The Ancient Egyptian embalmers must have been skilled in dissection and possessed surgical tools that enabled them to perform this fine procedure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/rct.0000000000000205

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To make the corpse look lifelike, the embalmers of the royal mummies dated to the New Kingdom usually used packs in the eyes, nose, mouth, and under the skin.

    “To make the corpse look lifelike, the embalmers of the royal mummies dated to the New Kingdom usually used packs in the eyes, nose, mouth, and under the skin (22).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saleem, S. N., & Hawass, Z.
Affiliations
Supreme Council of Antiquities (EG)
Venue
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Published
2015-02
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
1
ISSN
0363-8715 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979713328
Cited by
9
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
12.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Paleopathology and ancient diseases
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine Studies
Keywords
mummification, ancient Egyptian embalming, royal mummies, resins, linen, Amenhotep III, Tutankhamun, Seti I, Ramesses II, Thutmose I
MeSH terms
Egypt, Ancient, Embalming, Famous Persons, Foreign Bodies, Humans, Mummies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, History, Ancient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review