Cited by 22Paleopathology and ancient diseasesAncient Egypt and ArchaeologyCultural Heritage Materials Analysis

Multidetector computed tomographic study of amulets, jewelry, and other foreign objects in royal Egyptian mummies dated from the 18th to 20th dynasties

Saleem, Sahar N., Hawass, Zahi·2014·Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to study the role of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in the analysis of foreign objects found within or on the royal Egyptian mummies. METHODS: We studied MDCT images of 15 royal Egyptian mummies (1493-1156 BC) for the presence of foreign objects. We studied each found object for its location, morphology, dimensions, and density in correlation with the archeologic literature. RESULTS: We detected 14 objects in 6 mummies: a heart amulet, 3 Eye of Horus, 4 Sons of Horus, a crowned-Osiris amulet, 2 bracelets, 2 sets of beads/stones, and an arrowhead that may be linked to injury. The MDCT images suggested the material of the objects to be metal (n = 6), semiprecious stone (n = 1), quartzlike (faience) (n = 2), and fired clay (n = 5). Placement of an amulet within the heart supports our knowledge that its funeral purpose was meant for the purpose of protection. CONCLUSIONS: Multidetector computed tomography offers a detailed noninvasive analysis of objects on/in mummies and differentiates funerary objects from those that may be related to cause of death.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/rct.0b013e3182ab2221

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The material of objects was determined according to HU measurements: metal >2,978 HU; quartz/faience 1,693-2,317 HU; stones about 2,900-2,500 HU; and fired clay 1,116 HU SD 54.7.

    “The material of the object was determined according to its HU measurements: metal (>2,978 HU); quartz/faience (1,693–2,317 HU), stones (about 2,900–2,500 HU), and fired clay (1,116 HU SD 54.7) (17).”
  • Previous CT studies of the royal mummies of the New Kingdom found in the two royal caches identified Thutmose III to be wearing two golden bracelets hidden behind the wrappings.

    “Previous CT studies of the royal mummies of the New Kingdom found in the two royal caches identified Thutmose III (BC) to be wearing two golden bracelets hidden behind the wrappings (17).”
  • CT densities of amulets/jewelry enabled identification of their material composition.

    “The CT densities of the amulets/jewelry enabled the identification of its material composition (17).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saleem, S. N., & Hawass, Z.
Affiliations
Supreme Council of Antiquities (EG)
Venue
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Published
2014
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
153-158
ISSN
0363-8715 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2322053358
Cited by
22
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
13.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Paleopathology and ancient diseases
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Keywords
amulets, Eye of Horus, faience, bracelets, arrowhead, grave goods, causes of death, ancient Egyptian funerary practices
MeSH terms
Egypt, Foreign Bodies, Humans, Mummies, Jewelry, Multidetector Computed Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review