Cited by 71Medical Imaging and Pathology StudiesInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisPleural and Pulmonary Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lipoid Pneumonia in 53 Patients After Aspiration of Mineral Oil: Comparison of High-Resolution Computed Tomography Findings in Adults and Children

Marchiori, Edson, Zanetti, Gláucia, Mano, Claudia Mauro, Irion, Klaus Loureiro, Daltro, Pedro Augusto, Hochhegger, Bruno·2010·Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings in 53 patients with exogenous lipoid pneumonia and to compare the imaging features of adults and children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 35 children and 18 adults. Statistical comparisons of findings in the 2 age groups were performed using either Pearson chi2 or Fisher exact test, as appropriate, at 5% significance level. RESULTS: The main HRCT findings included air-space consolidation, ground glass attenuation, air-space nodules, and crazy-paving pattern. Abnormalities predominated in the posterior regions of the right lung. The right lower lobe was most likely to show severe involvement. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of air-space consolidation, the involvement of upper right lobe, and the central and posterior distribution of the lesions were more common in children, whereas the crazy-paving pattern and random localization were significantly more frequent in adults. The other findings were not different between the 2 groups.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/rct.0b013e3181a9ec9f

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Marchiori, E., Zanetti, G., Mano, C. M., Irion, K. L., Daltro, P. A., & Hochhegger, B.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Marchiori, Edson
Venue
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Published
2010-01
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
9-12
ISSN
0363-8715 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081068058
Cited by
71
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
Keywords
exogenous lipoid pneumonia, high-resolution computed tomography findings, air-space consolidation, ground-glass attenuation, crazy-paving pattern
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, Emollients, Female, Humans, Infant, Lung, Male, Middle Aged, Mineral Oil, Pneumonia, Lipid, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Observer Variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review