Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dual Energy CT Characterization of Urinary Calculi: Initial In Vitro and Clinical Experience

Graser, Anno, Johnson, Thorsten R. C., Bader, Markus, Staehler, Michael, Haseke, Nicolas, Nikolaou, Konstantin, Reiser, Maximilian F., Stief, Christian G., Becker, Christoph R.·2008·Investigative Radiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of dual energy CT (DECT) in the characterization of renal and ureteral stones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four renal calculi of known variable composition were scanned on a dual-source CT scanner (Somatom Definition; Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany) in dual energy (DECT) mode. Scan parameters for DECT were: tube potentials, 80 and 140 kV; tube current, 342 and 76 mA.s; collimation, 14 x 1.2 mm2. Dual energy properties of calculi were used to differentiate between uric acid (UA) and other calculi. Differentiation was based on a 3-material decomposition implemented in the dual energy software (Syngo VA 11; Siemens Medical Solutions). Color coding was used to display different types of stones and their DECT properties were characterized with density measurements at both photon energies. Subsequently, 20 consecutive patients with known or suspected uroliths were scanned using identical scan parameters. Stone size and material were assessed in DECT and compared with the chemical analyses of stones after mechanical extraction. RESULTS: With DECT characterization, differentiation of UA from other calculi was possible. Additionally, differentiation between cystine and struvite stones was shown to be feasible in vitro. In the patient cohort, DECT correctly characterized 4 UA calculi, 4 mixed, multiple calcified, and 1 cystine stone. The calculi were displayed in specific colors, ie, UA stones in red and calcified stones in blue. CONCLUSION: With dual energy CT techniques, the UA, cystine, struvite, and mixed renal calculi can be differentiated from other types of stones in vitro and in vivo. This is of clinical relevance as UA uroliths may be treated pharmacologically rather than with surgical extraction or extracorporal shockwave lithotripsy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/rli.0b013e318157a144

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 341

Metadata

Authors
Graser, A., Johnson, T. R. C., Bader, M., Staehler, M., Haseke, N., Nikolaou, K., Reiser, M. F., Stief, C. G., & Becker, C. R.
Venue
Investigative Radiology
Published
2008-02
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
112-119
ISSN
0020-9996 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041280958
Cited by
341
References
0
FWCI
18.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dual Energy CT Characterization of Urinary Calculi: Initial In Vitro and Clinical Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/rli.0b013e318157a144
The paper
Graser, A., Johnson, T. R. C., Bader, M., Staehler, M., Haseke, N., Nikolaou, K., Reiser, M. F., Stief, C. G., & Becker, C. R. (2008). Dual Energy CT Characterization of Urinary Calculi: Initial In Vitro and Clinical Experience. Investigative Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/rli.0b013e318157a144

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.