Cited by 3Anesthesia and Pain ManagementReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesAnesthesia and Sedative Agents

Anesthetic and Analgesic Efficient of Regional Nerve Blockade in Otoplasty

Kepekçi, Ali Bestemi, Kepekçi, Ahmet Hamdi·2020·Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Abstract

AIM: The prominent ear is the most common congenital deformity of the external ear. Otoplasty is performed to correct the appearance of the prominent ear. This study was planned to compare the analgesic and anesthetic effects of local nerve blockade and local infiltration anesthesia in the otoplasties. METHOD: Thirty-two patients who underwent otoplasty in both ears between February 2018 and March 2019 were included in the study. Three patients were excluded because they refused regional anesthesia. In the patients included in the study, only local infiltration anesthesia was applied to 1 ear and regional nerve blockade was applied to the other ear. Regional nerve blockade was applied to the study group; local infiltration anesthesia was applied to the control group. Surgical and anesthetic complications were recorded. The onset time, duration and severity of pain were followed. Numerical evaluation scale scores were used to evaluate pain levels. RESULTS: It was observed that the first pain of the patients On the side where regional nerve block (RNB) anesthesia was applied after an average of 10.5 hours. On the other hand on the side where local infiltration anesthesia was applied; the pain was observed to start after an average of 3.5 hours. At the 6th and 12th hours postoperatively, the scores of the numerical evaluation scale were significantly lower in the study group than the control group (P < 0.05). At the 24th-hour pain score, the values were lower in the study group, but the difference was not significant between the groups (P > 0.05). In the regional anesthesia group, can develop such as difficulty in swallowing, weakness in the neck, weakness in the upper extremity, nausea, Horner syndrome; but all side effects resolve spontaneously within 6 to 12 hours. CONCLUSION: The application of regional anesthesia in prominent ear surgical procedures can be considered as an alternative method to provide better quality preoperative anesthesia and better quality postoperative analgesia in patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/scs.0000000000006501

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kepekçi, A. B., & Kepekçi, A. H.
Affiliations
Istanbul Yeni Yüzyıl University (TR)
Corresponding author
  • Kepekçi, Ali Bestemi
  • Kepekçi, Ahmet Hamdi
Venue
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2020-05-04
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
1951-1954
ISSN
  • 1049-2275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-3732
OpenAlex
W3022386270
Cited by
3
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Keywords
otoplasty, nerve block, local infiltration anesthesia, postoperative pain, postoperative analgesia, prominent ears, Horner's syndrome, anesthesia complications, onset of anesthesia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analgesics, Anesthesia, Local, Anesthetics, Local, Ear, External, Humans, Nausea, Nerve Block, Postoperative Pain, Pain, Postoperative, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review