Cited by 17Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

Associated (Parallel) Tomographic Findings in Patients With Single-Sutural Synostosis

da Silva Freitas, Renato, de Freitas Azzolini, Thais, Shin, Joseph H., Persing, John A.·2010·Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Craniosynostosis is the premature fusion of 1 or more of the cranial sutures, which causes an abnormal skull shape. The treatment is complex and requires surgical intervention for correction, between 3 and 12 months of age. The current standard for diagnosing craniosynostosis is to obtain a computed tomographic (CT) scan. However, recent studies have emphasized potential problems associated with ionizing radiation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of the preoperative CT scan, and its findings, and to define the value of these data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of 89 patients with craniosynostosis during the period between 1998 and 2007, who had CT using the Yale-New Haven Hospital computer system. Clinical findings such as age, sex, and diagnosis were recorded. All intraoperative abnormalities were noted. Preoperative CT scans were reevaluated for accuracy and completeness of diagnosis, cerebral anomalies, and other head and neck pathologic conditions. RESULTS: Initially, 131 cases of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis were identified. Of these, we had access to CT evaluations in 89 patients. The mean age at the time of the surgery was 13 months, varying from 2 months to 18 years old. Most patients were males. The most common diagnoses were sagittal synostosis in 47 cases; unilateral coronal, 16; and metopic, 15. In most patients, the CT scan demonstrated the same diagnosis as the clinical examination-derived diagnosis. However, 6 patients had an incomplete diagnosis or misdiagnosis. In addition, 3 cases of prominence of the subarachnoid space, 2 cases of cerebral atrophy, 1 case of subarachnoid tumor, and 1 deformational dysplasia of encephalon were identified. Other minor additional diagnoses were 5 cases of fluid in the middle ear and antrum of mastoid, 2 cases of cysts in the maxilla, and 1 case of an associated cervical lymphatic tumor. CONCLUSIONS: The advantage of CT use is greater accuracy in diagnosis, less potential for inappropriate surgery, and, as an ancillary effect, a more complete and timely assessment of congenital anomalies so that more appropriate referrals can be made. Low-dose (pediatric) radiation CT still seems to have a place in the examination of a patient with skull deformity and potential craniosynostosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/scs.0b013e3181cfa7ad

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
da Silva Freitas, R., de Freitas Azzolini, T., Shin, J. H., & Persing, J. A.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Persing, John A.
Venue
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2010-03
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
411-413
ISSN
1049-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021117987
Cited by
17
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Keywords
craniosynostosis, single-suture craniosynostosis, preoperative CT, sagittal synostosis, coronal synostosis, metopic synostosis, diagnostic accuracy, pediatric radiation exposure, brain abnormalities, brain atrophy, cranial deformity, pediatric radiology, misdiagnosis, associated congenital anomalies, maxillary cysts
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Atrophy, Brain, Child, Child, Preschool, Cranial Sutures, Craniosynostoses, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Frontal Bone, Humans, Infant, Intraoperative Care, Jaw Cysts, Male, Maxillary Diseases, Otitis Media, Parietal Bone, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Subarachnoid Space, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review