Cited by 53Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations

Diagnosis of isolated sagittal synostosis: are radiographic studies necessary?

Agrawal, Deepak, Steinbok, Paul, Cochrane, D. Douglas·2006·Child's Nervous System

Abstract

Aims and objectives Isolated sagittal synostosis can be diagnosed easily on clinical grounds. This study was designed to determine if children could be operated on based solely on a clinical diagnosis or whether such an approach would result in any potentially unnecessary surgeries.Materials and methods Records of 114 consecutive children operated on for isolated nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis over a 14-year period (1987-2000) were reviewed to see whether the clinical findings were in concordance with the intraoperative findings and histopathology of the sagittal suture.Results The age at surgery ranged from 1.9 to 81.3 months (median 4.3 months). Preoperative skull radiographs were done in 78 children and computer tomography (CT) scans of the head in 12 children. One hundred percent of the skull radiographs and 83.3% of the CT scans were completed prior to referring the children to a pediatric neurosurgeon. CT scans confirmed the diagnosis in all patients in whom it was available. For the rest, pathology reports and/or operative records were available for 108 (94.7%) children and were confirmatory for sagittal craniosynostosis in all.Conclusions Accurate diagnosis of isolated sagittal synostosis can be made clinically, and operative correction can proceed without a need for radiological investigations, unless the clinical features are not completely typical. This approach could result in significantly reduced radiation exposure for the developing brain and could provide economic benefits to health care providers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00381-005-1243-0

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agrawal, D., Steinbok, P., & Cochrane, D. D.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Steinbok, Paul
Venue
Child's Nervous System
Published
2005-09-27
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
375-378
ISSN
  • 0256-7040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-0350
OpenAlex
W2043172648
Cited by
53
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child s Nervous System (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Keywords
craniosynostosis, diagnosis, radiographic diagnosis, skull radiographs, head CT, unnecessary surgery, radiation exposure, pediatric neurosurgery, nonsyndromic craniosynostosis
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Cranial Sutures, Craniosynostoses, Humans, Infant, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review