Cited by 24Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesFace Recognition and PerceptionBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Effect of Protruding Ears on Visual Fixation Time and Perception of Personality

Litschel, Ralph, Majoor, Juleke, Tasman, Abel-Jan·2015·JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery

Abstract

Importance Protruding ears are often thought to be a stigma, supposedly drawing attention and negatively influencing the perception of personality. These purported negative effects that may indicate corrective aesthetic otoplasty in patients too young to provide informed consent have not been quantified. Objective To quantify attention directed toward protruding ears and its effect on the perception of selected personality traits. Design, setting, and participants In this observational study conducted from August 1, 2013, to October 31, 2013, visual scan paths were recorded of 20 lay observers looking at photographs of faces of 20 children (age range, 5-19 years) with either protruding ears or ears morphed via computer software to appear nonprotruding. Subsequently, the observers rated 10 perceived personality traits based on the same photographs. Main outcomes and measures Visual fixation time on protruding vs nonprotruding ears was compared and correlated with observers' scores for personality traits. Results Fixation time on protruding ears was significantly longer compared with that for morphed nonprotruding ears (mean [SD], 9.6% [5.6%] vs 5.8% [3.2%] of total fixation time, P = .04). The difference between the overall personality questionnaire scores and between individual scores for assiduousness, intelligence, and likeability was not significant for protruding and nonprotruding ears. Faces in which the protruding auricles received the highest percentage of visual atten…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.0078

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protruding ears attract visual attention, but do not affect perceived intelligence or likability.

    “Protruding ears attract visual attention, but do not affect perceived intelligence or likability.74”
  • Nonsurgical approaches, such as newborn auricular molding, leverage early cartilage plasticity with promising outcomes.

    “Nonsurgical approaches, such as newborn auricular molding, leverage early cartilage plasticity with promising outcomes.70–73”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Litschel, R., Majoor, J., & Tasman, A.-J.
Affiliations
Kantonsspital St. Gallen (CH)
Corresponding author
Tasman, Abel-Jan
Venue
JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery
Published
2015-05
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
183-189
ISSN
  • 2168-6076 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6092
OpenAlex
W2101453105
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
protruding ears, otoplasty, facial attractiveness, perceived personality traits, social stigma, children, face perception, likeability, intelligence perception
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Ear, External, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Photography, Social Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review