Cited by 44Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

Minimally Invasive Strip Craniectomy for Sagittal Synostosis

Gociman, Barbu, Marengo, Jason, Ying, Jian, Kestle, John R.W., Siddiqi, Faizi·2012·Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Abstract

The most common approaches used today for the correction of sagittal synostosis involve large craniectomies and extensive cranial vault remodeling. Although these techniques ultimately yield very good cosmetic results, they have significant drawbacks. They are lengthy, expensive, associated with significant blood loss, universally require transfusions, and often result in prolonged hospitalization.We present here our 5-year experience with correction of sagittal synostosis using the recently described minimally invasive strip craniectomy followed by postoperative cranial vault helmet molding. During this period, we treated a total of 97 children with nonsyndromic single-suture synostosis. The first 46 of 67 children treated for sagittal synostosis had at least 1 year of postoperative follow-up and were included in the analysis. There were 33 boys and 13 girls. Patients' mean age at surgery was 3.1 months, and the mean weight was 6.1 kg. The mean operative time was 75 minutes. The estimated blood loss during the procedure was 56 mL. Eight patients received blood transfusions during surgery (17.4%) and 3 patients received after surgery (6.5%). There were no significant postoperative complications. The mean hospitalization was 2.2 days. Excellent aesthetic outcomes were noted in all patients. The change in cranial index from a preoperative value of 0.7 to 0.8 postoperatively was virtually stabilized 3 months after the surgical intervention. Significantly better correction rates were observed in the youngest patients.Because of its excellent attributes, minimally invasive strip craniectomy followed by postoperative helmet molding is likely to become the preferred treatment modality for the correction of sagittal synostosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/scs.0b013e31824dbcd5

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gociman, B., Marengo, J., Ying, J., Kestle, J. R. W., & Siddiqi, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Primary Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gociman, Barbu
  • Marengo, Jason
  • Siddiqi, Faizi
Venue
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2012-05
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
825-828
ISSN
1049-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2335479737
Cited by
44
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (C06RR011234, C06-RR-11234, UL1RR025764)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
sagittal synostosis, strip craniectomy, cranial vault remodeling, nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, cranial index, blood loss, postoperative complications, cosmetic outcome
MeSH terms
Blood Transfusion, Craniosynostoses, Craniotomy, Esthetics, Female, Head Protective Devices, Humans, Infant, Length of Stay, Male, Retrospective Studies, Blood Loss, Surgical, Treatment Outcome, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, Plastic Surgery Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review