The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
INCREASED LEVELS OF GLYCOSAMINOGLYCANS DURING SEPTIC SHOCK: RELATION TO MORTALITY AND THE ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIONS OF PLASMA
Abstract
Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are structurally heterogeneous negatively charged polysaccharides. Endothelial GAGs, also known as glycocalyx, are involved in capillary permeability. In rat venules stimulated with proinflammatory substances ex vivo, the GAG-containing proteoglycan, syndecan-1, is shed from the endothelium. We wanted to investigate if we could trace the same response during septic shock as reflected in the circulating GAG levels. Arterial plasma samples were collected from 18 consecutive septic shock patients admitted to our intensive care unit. Plasma GAGs were measured with an Alcian blue slot binding assay, and syndecan-1 levels were measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Effects of GAGs on the antibacterial activity of plasma were assessed by a radial diffusion assay. The median plasma GAG level was significantly higher in the septic shock patients than in matched controls (median [interquartile range], 2.7 microg/mL [1.9 - 4.8 microg/mL] vs. 1.8 microg/mL [1.7 - 2.0 microg/mL]). Furthermore, the GAG levels were significantly higher in nonsurvivors (4.6 microg/mL [3.1 - 8.8 microg/mL], n = 8) than survivors (1.8 microg/mL [1.6 - 2.6 microg/mL], n = 10). The syndecan-1 levels were also increased in the patients compared with controls (246 ng/mL [180 - 496 ng/mL] vs. 26 ng/mL [23 - 31 ng/mL]) and correlated to the cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. The GAGs inhibited the endogenous antibacterial activity of plasma as well as isolated antimicrobial peptides. The concentrations required were in the same range as the GAG levels measured in the patients. These results show that the GAG levels are increased in septic shock patients, possibly reflecting peripheral endothelial cell damage. We also found that GAGs in relevant concentrations neutralize antimicrobial peptides in plasma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Taylor, K. R., & Gallo, R. L. (2006) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.05-4682rev · Cited by 639
Cited by
The glycocalyx: a novel diagnostic and therapeutic target in sepsis
Uchimido, R., Schmidt, E. P., & Shapiro, N. I. (2019) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-018-2292-6 · Cited by 710
Calzavacca, P., Licari, E., & Bellomo, R. (2010) · Surgical Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77893-8_38 · Cited by 533
The endothelial glycocalyx: a review of the vascular barrier
Alphonsus, C. S., & Rodseth, R. N. (2014) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/anae.12661 · Cited by 460
Therapeutic strategies targeting the endothelial glycocalyx: acute deficits, but great potential
Becker, B. F., Chappell, D., Bruegger, D., Annecke, T., & Jacob, M. (2010) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvq137 · Cited by 438
Derangement of the endothelial glycocalyx in sepsis
Iba, T., & Levy, J. H. (2019) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/jth.14371 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, A., Berkestedt, I., Schmidtchen, A., Ljunggren, L., & Bodelsson, M.
- Venue
- Shock
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 623-627
- ISSN
- 1073-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124216717
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: INCREASED LEVELS OF GLYCOSAMINOGLYCANS DURING SEPTIC SHOCK: RELATION TO MORTALITY AND THE ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIONS OF PLASMA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/shk.0b013e3181777da3
- The paper
- Nelson, A., Berkestedt, I., Schmidtchen, A., Ljunggren, L., & Bodelsson, M. (2008). INCREASED LEVELS OF GLYCOSAMINOGLYCANS DURING SEPTIC SHOCK: RELATION TO MORTALITY AND THE ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIONS OF PLASMA. Shock. https://doi.org/10.1097/shk.0b013e3181777da3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.