Cited by 123Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Treatment and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized Pilot Trial of Bariatric Surgery Versus Intensive Medical Weight Management on Diabetes Remission in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Who Do NOT Meet NIH Criteria for Surgery and the Role of Soluble RAGE as a Novel Biomarker of Success

Open access
Parikh, Manish, Chung, Mimi, Sheth, Sheetal, McMacken, Michelle, Zahra, Tasneem, Saunders, John K., Ude-Welcome, Aku, Dunn, Van, Ogedegbe, Gbenga, Schmidt, Ann Marie, Pachter, H. Leon·2014·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Objective: To compare bariatric surgery versus intensive medical weight management (MWM) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who do not meet current National Institutes of Health criteria for bariatric surgery and to assess whether the soluble form of receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) is a biomarker to identify patients most likely to benefit from surgery. Background: There are few studies comparing surgery to MWM for patients with T2DM and BMI less than 35. Methods: Fifty-seven patients with T2DM and BMI 30 to 35, who otherwise met the criteria for bariatric surgery were randomized to MWM versus surgery (bypass, sleeve or band, based on patient preference). The primary outcomes assessed at 6 months were change in homeostatic model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and diabetes remission. Secondary outcomes included changes in HbA1c, weight, and sRAGE. Results: The surgery group had improved HOMA-IR (−4.6 vs +1.6; P = 0.0004) and higher diabetes remission (65% vs 0%, P < 0.0001) than the MWM group at 6 months. Compared to MWM, the surgery group had lower HbA1c (6.2 vs 7.8, P = 0.002), lower fasting glucose (99.5 vs 157; P = 0.0068), and fewer T2DM medication requirements (20% vs 88%; P < 0.0001) at 6 months. The surgery group lost more weight (7. vs 1.0 BMI decrease, P < 0.0001). Higher baseline sRAGE was associated with better weight loss outcomes (r = −0.641; P = 0.046). There were no mortalities. Conclusions: Surgery was very effective short-term in patients with T2DM and BMI 30 to 35. Baseline sRAGE may predict patients most likely to benefit from surgery. These findings need to be confirmed with larger studies. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01423877 This pilot randomized trial comparing bariatric surgery to medical weight management in patients with type 2 diabetes and BMI 30 to 35 found that surgery was very effective in improving insulin resistance and inducing diabetes remission at 6 months. We also found that sRAGE may be a good biomarker to identify which patients benefit most from surgery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0000000000000919

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–123 of 123

Metadata

Authors
Parikh, M., Chung, M., Sheth, S., McMacken, M., Zahra, T., Saunders, J. K., Ude-Welcome, A., Dunn, V., Ogedegbe, G., Schmidt, A. M., & Pachter, H. L.
Affiliations
  • Lincoln Medical Center (US)
  • New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (US)
  • Bellevue Hospital Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Parikh, Manish
  • Chung, Mimi
  • Sheth, Sheetal
  • Saunders, John K.
  • Pachter, H. Leon
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2014-10
Volume
260
Issue
4
Pages
617-624
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2334320614
Cited by
123
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 6
FWCI
10.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K12HS019473)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR029893, KL2RR029891)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
bariatric surgery, type 2 diabetes, diabetes remission, soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products, treatment response biomarkers, insulin resistance, HOMA-IR, HbA1c, weight loss, sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, gastric band, obesity
MeSH terms
Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products, Adult, Counseling, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Exercise Therapy, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Pilot Projects, Receptors, Immunologic, Remission Induction, Biomarkers, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Glycation End Products, Advanced, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review