Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multicenter, Prospective, Longitudinal Study of the Recurrence, Surgical Site Infection, and Quality of Life After Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair Using Biosynthetic Absorbable Mesh: The COBRA Study

Rosen, Michael J., Bauer, Joel J., Harmaty, Marco, Carbonell, Alfredo M., Cobb, William S., Matthews, Brent, Goldblatt, Matthew I., Selzer, Don J., Poulose, Benjamin K., Hansson, Bibi M. E., Rosman, Camiel, Chao, James J., Jacobsen, Garth R.·2017·Annals of Surgery
DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000001601
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0000000000001601

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Cobb, 2009, Infection risk of open placement of intraperitoneal composite mesh, Am Surg, 75, 762, 10.1177/000313480907500905 · DOI
  2. Hawn, 2010, Long-term follow-up of technical outcomes for incisional hernia repair, J Am Coll Surg, 210, 648, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.038 · DOI
  3. Luijendijk, 2000, A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia, N Eng J Med, 343, 392, 10.1056/NEJM200008103430603 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Park, 2006, Abdominal wall hernia, Curr Probl Surg, 43, 326, 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2006.02.004 · DOI
  5. Baillie, 2007, Use of human and porcine dermal-derived bioprostheses in complex abdominal wall reconstructions: a literature review and case report, Ostomy Wound Manage, 53, 30
  6. Breuing, 2010, Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair, Surgery, 148, 544, 10.1016/j.surg.2010.01.008 · DOI
  7. Rosen, 2013, A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh, Ann Surg, 257, 991, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182849871 · DOI
  8. Burns, 2010, Non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for abdominal wall reconstruction, Plast Reconstr Surg, 125, 167, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c2a6ed · DOI
  9. Itani, 2012, Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: the RICH Study, Surgery, 152, 498, 10.1016/j.surg.2012.04.008 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Kim, 2006, Acellular dermal matrix in the management of high-risk abdominal wall defects, Am J Surg, 192, 705, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.09.003 · DOI
  11. Katz, 1985, A new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture made from polytrimethylene carbonate, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 161, 213
  12. Mangram, 1999, Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 20, 250
  13. Muysoms, 2009, Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias, Hernia, 13, 407, 10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x · DOI
  14. Stoppa, 1989, The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias, World J Surg, 13, 545, 10.1007/BF01658869 · DOI
  15. Kanters, 2012, Modified hernia grading scale to stratify surgical site occurrence after open ventral hernia repairs, J Am Coll Surg, 215, 787, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.08.012 · DOI
  16. de Vries Reilingh, 2007, Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: “components separation technique” versus prosthetic repair: interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial, World J Surg, 31, 756, 10.1007/s00268-006-0502-x · DOI
  17. Rosen, 2013, Evaluation of surgical outcomes of retro-rectus versus intraperitoneal reinforcement with bio-prosthetic mesh in the repair of contaminated ventral hernias, Hernia, 17, 31, 10.1007/s10029-012-0909-2 · DOI
  18. Helgstrand, 2013, Nationwide prospective study of outcomes after elective incisional hernia repair, J Am Coll Surg, 216, 217, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
  19. de Vries Reilingh, 2007, Autologous tissue repair of large abdominal wall defects, Br J Surg, 94, 791, 10.1002/bjs.5817 · DOI
  20. Reynolds, 2013, Financial implications of ventral hernia repair: a hospital cost analysis, J Gastrointest Surg, 17, 159, 10.1007/s11605-012-1999-y · DOI
  21. Poulose, 2012, Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research, Hernia, 16, 179, 10.1007/s10029-011-0879-9 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Carbonell, 2013, Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs, J Am Coll Surg, 217, 991, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.382 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Petro, 2015, Central failures of lightweight monofilament polyester mesh causing hernia recurrence: a cautionary note, Hernia, 19, 155, 10.1007/s10029-014-1237-5 · DOI
  24. Conze, 2005, Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight composite mesh with polyester or polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair, Br J Surg, 92, 1488, 10.1002/bjs.5208 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Rosen, M. J., Bauer, J. J., Harmaty, M., Carbonell, A. M., Cobb, W. S., Matthews, B., Goldblatt, M. I., Selzer, D. J., Poulose, B. K., Hansson, B. M. E., Rosman, C., Chao, J. J., & Jacobsen, G. R.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2017-01
Volume
265
Issue
1
Pages
205-211
ISSN
0003-4932
DOI
10.1097/sla.0000000000001601
Cited by
259
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.