Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preoperative Prognostic Score for Predicting Survival After Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases

Malik, Hassan Z., Prasad, K Rajendra, Halazun, Karim J., Aldoori, Amir, Al-Mukhtar, Ahmed, Gomez, Dhanwant, Lodge, J Peter A., Toogood, Giles J.·2007·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Background: Despite indications for resection of colorectal liver metastases having expanded, debate continues about identifying patients that may benefit from surgery. Methods: Clinicopathologic data from a total of 700 patients was gathered between January 1993 and January 2006 from a prospectively maintained dataset. Of these, 687 patients underwent resection for colorectal liver metastases. Results: The median age of patient was 64 years and 36.8% of patients had synchronous disease. The overall 5-year survival was 45%. The presence of an inflammatory response to tumor (IRT), defined by an elevated C-reactive protein (>10 mg/L) or a neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio of >5:1, was noted in 24.5% of cases. Only the number of metastases and the presence or absence of an IRT influenced both overall and disease-free survival on multivariable analysis. A preoperative prognostic score was derived: 0 = less than 8 metastases and absence of IRT; 1 = 8 or more metastases or IRT, and 2 = 8 or more metastases and IRT—from the results of the multivariable analysis. The 5-year survival of those scoring 0 was 49% compared with 34% for those scoring 1. None of the patients that scored 2 were alive at 5 years. Conclusion: The preoperative prognostic score is a simple and effective system allowing preoperative stratification. Clinicopathologic review of patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases identified 2 factors, namely 8 or more metastases and an inflammatory response to tumor that adversely influence outcome. The derived prognostic score can be calculated preoperatively, allowing clinicians to optimize patient care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e318142d964

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Malik, H. Z., Prasad, K. R., Halazun, K. J., Aldoori, A., Al-Mukhtar, A., Gomez, D., Lodge, J. P. A., & Toogood, G. J.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2007-11
Volume
246
Issue
5
Pages
806-814
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094002672
Cited by
204
References
3
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preoperative Prognostic Score for Predicting Survival After Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e318142d964
The paper
Malik, H. Z., Prasad, K. R., Halazun, K. J., Aldoori, A., Al-Mukhtar, A., Gomez, D., Lodge, J. P. A., & Toogood, G. J. (2007). Preoperative Prognostic Score for Predicting Survival After Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e318142d964

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.