The DOI matches its Crossref record.
World Review of Laparoscopic Liver Resection—2,804 Patients
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide a review of the world literature on laparoscopic liver resection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Initially described for peripheral, benign tumors resected by nonanatomic wedge resections, minimally invasive liver resections are now being performed more frequently, even for larger, malignant tumors located in challenging locations. Although a few small review articles have been reported, a comprehensive review on laparoscopic liver resection has not been published. METHODS: We conducted a literature search using Pubmed, screening all English publications on laparoscopic liver resections. All data were analyzed and apparent case duplications in updated series were excluded from the total number of patients. Tumor type, operative characteristics, perioperative morbidity, and oncologic outcomes were tabulated. RESULTS: A total of 127 published articles of original series on laparoscopic liver resection were identified, and accounted for 2,804 reported minimally invasive liver resections. Fifty percent were for malignant tumors, 45% were for benign lesions, 1.7% were for live donor hepatectomies, and the rest were indeterminate. Of the resections, 75% were performed totally laparoscopically, 17% were hand-assisted, and 2% were laparoscopic-assisted open hepatic resection (hybrid) technique, with the remainder being other techniques or conversions to open hepatectomies. The most common laparoscopic liver resection was a wedge resection or segmentectomy (45%) followed by anatomic left lateral sectionectomy (20%), right hepatectomy (9%), and left hepatectomy (7%). Conversion from laparoscopy to open laparotomy and from laparoscopy to hand-assisted approach occurred in 4.1% and 0.7% of reported cases, respectively. Overall mortality was 9 of 2,804 patients (0.3%), and morbidity was 10.5%, with no intraoperative deaths reported. The most common cause of postoperative death was liver failure. Postoperative bile leak was observed in 1.5% of cases. For cancer resections, negative surgical margins were achieved in 82% to 100% of reported series. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates after laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma were 50% to 75% and 31% to 38.2%, respectively. The 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates after laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal metastasis to the liver were 80% to 87% and 51%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In experienced hands, laparoscopic liver resections are safe with acceptable morbidity and mortality for both minor and major hepatic resections. Oncologically, 3- and 5-year survival rates reported for hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal cancer metastases are comparable to open hepatic resection, albeit in a selected group of patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comparative Short-term Benefits of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: 9000 Cases and Climbing
Ciria, R., Cherqui, D., Geller, D. A., Briceno, J., & Wakabayashi, G. (2016) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000001413 · Cited by 747
Self-citationLi, W., Zhou, X., Huang, Z., Zhang, H., Zhang, L., Shang, C., & Chen, Y. (2015) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-014-4041-5 · Cited by 46
Ng, K. T.-P., Pang, L., Wang, J.-Q., She, W. H., Tsang, S. H.-Y., Lo, C. M., Man, K., & Cheung, T. T. (2024) · Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International · doi:10.1016/j.hbpd.2023.10.006 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Nguyen, K. T., Gamblin, T. C., & Geller, D. A.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 250
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 831-841
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031834285
- Cited by
- 1,136
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: World Review of Laparoscopic Liver Resection—2,804 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b0c4df
- The paper
- Nguyen, K. T., Gamblin, T. C., & Geller, D. A. (2009). World Review of Laparoscopic Liver Resection—2,804 Patients. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b0c4df
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.