Cited by 328Renal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

One thousand simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants at a single center with 22-year follow-up

Sollinger, Hans W., Odorico, Jon S., Becker, Yolanda T., D'Alessandro, Anthony M., Pirsch, John D.·2009·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

Objective Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) is a procedure which frees the diabetic patient with end-stage nephropathy from dialysis and daily insulin injections. The purpose of this study is to report long-term outcomes of this procedure, and describe surgical and medical complications. Methods The analysis includes 1000 consecutive SPKs performed between 1985 and 2007. Bladder drainage was used in 390 patients and enteric drainage in 610 patients. In 362 patients, SPK transplantation was performed before initiation of dialysis. Results Patient survival at 1, 10, and 20 years is 97%, 80%, and 58%; kidney survival is 91%, 63%, and 38%; and pancreas survival is 88%, 63%, and 36%, respectively. There was no difference (P > 0.19) for patient, kidney, and pancreas survival between bladder and enteric drainage. Major surgical complications for bladder-drained patients were anastomotic leaks, urological complications, and infections. For enteric-drained patients, major surgical complications were infection, bleeding, and enzyme leak. Principal causes of death were myocardial infarction (n = 23), cerebrovascular accident (n = 18), and renal failure (n = 15). Graft failure for the kidney was due to acute rejection (n = 48), chronic rejection (n = 146), and death with a functioning graft (n = 99). Graft failure for the pancreas was caused by chronic graft loss (n = 44), thrombosis (n = 31), rejection (n = 80), and death with a functioning graft (n = 125). A total of 1…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b76d2b

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sollinger, H. W., Odorico, J. S., Becker, Y. T., D'Alessandro, A. M., & Pirsch, J. D.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2009-10
Volume
250
Issue
4
Pages
618-630
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973607748
Cited by
328
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 21
FWCI
12.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation, type 1 diabetes, end-stage renal disease, long-term graft survival, bladder drainage, enteric drainage, surgical complications, retransplantation, recurrent urinary tract infection, hematuria, patient survival, causes of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, thrombosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Drainage, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Graft Rejection, Humans, Immunosuppression Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Prognosis, Registries, Reoperation, Survival Rate, Kidney Transplantation, Pancreas Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review