Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 400

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Biliary Complications After Liver Transplantation From Donation After Cardiac Death Donors: An Analysis of Risk Factors and Long-term Outcomes From a Single Center

Open access
Foley, David P., Fernandez, Luis A., Leverson, Glen, Anderson, Michael, Mezrich, Joshua, Sollinger, Hans W., D'Alessandro, Anthony·2011·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the long-term outcomes, biliary complication rates, and risk factors for biliary complications after liver transplantation from "donation after cardiac death" (DCD) donors. BACKGROUND: Recent enthusiasm toward increased use of DCD donors' livers is mitigated by high biliary complication rates. Predictive risk factors for the development of biliary complications after DCD liver transplantation remain incompletely defined. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 1157 "donation after brain death" (DBD) and 87 DCD liver transplants performed between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 2008. Patient and graft survivals and complication rates within the first year of transplantation were compared between DBD and DCD groups. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the influence of potential risk factors. RESULTS: Patient survival was significantly lower in the DCD group compared with the DBD group at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years (DCD: 84%, 68%, 54%, and 54% vs DBD: 91%, 81%, 67%, and 58%; P < 0.01). Graft survival was also significantly lower in the DCD group compared with the DBD group at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years (DCD: 69%, 56%, 43%, 43% vs DBD: 86%, 76%, 60%, 51%; P < 0.001). Rates of overall biliary complications (OBC) (DCD: 47% vs DBD: 26%; P < 0.01) and ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) (DCD: 34% vs DBD: 1%; P < 0.01) were significantly higher in the DCD group. Donor age [hazard ratio (HR): 1.04; P < 0.01] and donor age greater than 40 years (HR: 3.13; P < 0.01) were significant risk factors for the development of OBC. Multivariate analysis revealed that cold ischemic time (CIT) greater than 8 hours (HR: 2.46; P = 0.05) and donor age greater than 40 years (HR: 2.90; P < 0.01) significantly increased the risk of IC. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term patient and graft survival after DCD liver transplantation remain significantly lower but acceptable when compared with DBD liver transplantations. Donor age and CIT greater than 8 hours are the strongest predictors for the development of IC. Careful selection of younger DCD donors and minimization of CIT may limit the incidence of severe biliary complications and improve the successful utilization of DCD donors' livers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e3182104784

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 400

Metadata

Authors
Foley, D. P., Fernandez, L. A., Leverson, G., Anderson, M., Mezrich, J., Sollinger, H. W., & D'Alessandro, A.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2011-04
Volume
253
Issue
4
Pages
817-825
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052689544
Cited by
400
References
0
FWCI
26.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biliary Complications After Liver Transplantation From Donation After Cardiac Death Donors: An Analysis of Risk Factors and Long-term Outcomes From a Single Center. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182104784
The paper
Foley, D. P., Fernandez, L. A., Leverson, G., Anderson, M., Mezrich, J., Sollinger, H. W., & D'Alessandro, A. (2011). Biliary Complications After Liver Transplantation From Donation After Cardiac Death Donors: An Analysis of Risk Factors and Long-term Outcomes From a Single Center. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182104784

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.