Cited by 19Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsAnatomy and Medical TechnologyAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

Patient-Specific Pessaries for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using Three-Dimensional Printing: A Pilot Study

Open access
Hong, Christopher X., Zhang, Shufei, Eltahawi, Ahmed, Borazjani, Ali, Kalami, Hamed, San, Aye Nyein, Sham, Derek, Ameri, Golafsoun +1 more·2023·Urogynecology

Abstract

Importance: Vaginal pessaries are an effective nonsurgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) when properly fitted. However, pessary fitting and use are often unsuccessful or imperfect. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of using patient-specific pessaries fabricated from three-dimensional (3D)-printed molds to improve POP symptoms and increase overall satisfaction of pessary treatment in patients using standard vaginal pessaries. Study Design: Patients undergoing POP treatment with standard vaginal pessaries were enrolled in this pilot prospective study. Patient-specific pessaries were designed and fabricated for each patient using patient input, physician input, and anatomic measurements from clinical assessment. Pessary fabrication involved injection of biocompatible liquid silicone rubber into 3D-printed molds followed by a biocompatible silicone coating. Pelvic organ prolapse symptomatic distress and pessary treatment satisfaction were evaluated before and after a 3-week patient-specific pessary home trial using the validated Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6 form and a visual analog scale, respectively. Results: Eight women were included in this study. Changing from standard pessary to patient-specific pessary treatment was associated with an improvement in prolapse symptoms on the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6 (median change, −3.5; interquartile range, −5 to −2.5; P = 0.02) and an increase in overall pessary satisfaction on a visual analog scale (median change, +2.0; interquartile range, +1.0 to +3.0; P = 0.02). All patients reported either an improvement or no change in pessary ease of use, comfort, and the feeling of support provided by the pessary. Conclusion: Patient-specific vaginal pessaries are a promising alternative to standard pessaries for alleviating POP symptoms and improving patient satisfaction with pessary use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/spv.0000000000001346

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of newer 3-D printed pessaries appears to be associated with improvements in quality of life and in the pelvic floor distress inventory in small pilot studies.

    “For example, use of newer 3‐D printed pessaries appears to be associated with improvements in quality of life and in the pelvic floor distress inventory in small pilot studies, warranting further exploration of use [52, 53, 54].”

    From How Can We Improve the Assessment and Indifferent Outcomes From Pelvic Organ Prolapse Management From Conservative and Surgical Therapies? ICI‐RS 2025 (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Results section (page unavailable) reports improved prolapse distress on the POPDI-6 and greater pessary satisfaction in eight women after switching to patient-specific 3-D printed pessaries. It does not report a quality-of-life outcome or an improvement on the full Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory; POPDI-6 is the narrower measure used here. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [15]Gabbay DM Thagard P. Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Science; 2009.
  2. [19]Pessary Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Type (Gellhorn, Ring, Donut), By End-use (Hospitals, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Clinics), By Region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, MEA), And Segment Forecasts, 2021–2028. San Francisco, CA: Grand View Research; 2021: 120 pp.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hong, C. X., Zhang, S., Eltahawi, A., Borazjani, A., Kalami, H., San, A. N., Sham, D., Ameri, G., & McDermott, C. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Cosm Medical Corp., Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Hong, Christopher X.
Venue
Urogynecology
Published
2023-03-09
Volume
29
Issue
9
Pages
732-739
ISSN
  • 2151-8378 (ISSN-L)
  • 2771-1897
OpenAlex
W4353020733
Cited by
19
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Urogynecology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, pessary, three-dimensional printing, pessary fitting, conservative treatment
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Pessaries, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Printing, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review