The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Brain-Injured Patients is Associated With Worsening of Survival
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) recommends intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 8 or less, and an abnormal brain computed tomography. However, benefits of ICP monitoring have not been documented. We hypothesized that BTF criteria for ICP monitoring in blunt TBI do not identify patients who are likely to benefit from it. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank (1994-2001) was analyzed. Inclusion criteria were blunt TBI, head-abbreviated injury score (AIS) 3 to 6, age 20 to 50 years, GCS </=8, abnormal brain computed tomographic scan, and intensive care unit admission for 3 days or more. Early deaths (<48 hours) and delayed admissions (>24 hours after injury) were excluded. Patients who underwent ICP monitoring (n = 708) were compared with those did not (n = 938). Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between ICP monitoring and survival, while controlling for overall injury severity, TBI severity, craniotomy, associated injuries, comorbidities, and complications. RESULTS: ICP monitoring was performed in only 43% of patients who met BTF criteria. There were no group differences in age, gender, or GCS. After adjusting for multiple potential confounding factors including, admission GCS, age, blood pressure, head AIS, and injury severity score (ISS), ICP monitoring was associated with a 45% reduction in survival (OR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39-0.76; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ICP monitoring in accordance with current BTF criteria is associated with worsening of survival in TBI patients. A prospective randomized controlled trial of ICP-guided therapy is needed. Until then, the use of ICP monitoring should not be used as a quality benchmark.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition
Carney, N., Totten, A. M., O'Reilly, C., Ullman, J. S., Hawryluk, G. W. J., Bell, M. J., Bratton, S. L., Chesnut, R., Harris, O. A., Kissoon, N., et al. (2017) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000001432 · Cited by 4,357
Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults
Maas, A. I., Stocchetti, N., & Bullock, R. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70164-9 · Cited by 2,123
A Trial of Intracranial-Pressure Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury
Chesnut, R. M., Temkin, N., Carney, N., Dikmen, S., Rondina, C., Videtta, W., Petroni, G., Lujan, S., Pridgeon, J., Barber, J., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1207363 · Cited by 1,352
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Invasive versus Non-Invasive Methods—A Review
Raboel, P. H., Bartek, J., Andresen, M., Bellander, B. M., & Romner, B. (2012) · Critical Care Research and Practice · doi:10.1155/2012/950393 · Cited by 416
Critical care management of severe traumatic brain injury in adults
Haddad, S. H., & Arabi, Y. M. (2012) · Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1186/1757-7241-20-12 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Shafi, S., Diaz-Arrastia, R., Madden, C., & Gentilello, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 335-340
- ISSN
- 0022-5282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050016443
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Brain-Injured Patients is Associated With Worsening of Survival. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ta.0b013e31815dd017
- The paper
- Shafi, S., Diaz-Arrastia, R., Madden, C., & Gentilello, L. (2008). Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Brain-Injured Patients is Associated With Worsening of Survival. Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e31815dd017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.