Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 416

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Invasive versus Non-Invasive Methods—A Review

Open access
Raboel, P. H., Bartek, J., Andresen, M., Bellander, B. M., Romner, B.·2012·Critical Care Research and Practice
DOI 10.1155/2012/950393
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) has been used for decades in the fields of neurosurgery and neurology. There are multiple techniques: invasive as well as noninvasive. This paper aims to provide an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of the most common and well-known methods as well as assess whether noninvasive techniques (transcranial Doppler, tympanic membrane displacement, optic nerve sheath diameter, CT scan/MRI and fundoscopy) can be used as reliable alternatives to the invasive techniques (ventriculostomy and microtransducers). Ventriculostomy is considered the gold standard in terms of accurate measurement of pressure, although microtransducers generally are just as accurate. Both invasive techniques are associated with a minor risk of complications such as hemorrhage and infection. Furthermore, zero drift is a problem with selected microtransducers. The non-invasive techniques are without the invasive methods' risk of complication, but fail to measure ICP accurately enough to be used as routine alternatives to invasive measurement. We conclude that invasive measurement is currently the only option for accurate measurement of ICP.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2012/950393

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Cited by

See all 416

Metadata

Authors
Raboel, P. H., Bartek, J., Andresen, M., Bellander, B. M., & Romner, B.
Venue
Critical Care Research and Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012
Volume
2012
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 2090-1305 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-1313
DOI
10.1155/2012/950393
OpenAlex
W1986686551
Cited by
416
References
59
FWCI
13.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Invasive versus Non-Invasive Methods—A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2012/950393
The paper
Raboel, P. H., Bartek, J., Andresen, M., Bellander, B. M., & Romner, B. (2012). Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Invasive versus Non-Invasive Methods—A Review. Critical Care Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/950393

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.