Cited by 193Renal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesOrgan Donation and Transplantation

Effects of Obesity on Kidney Transplantation Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nicoletto, Bruna B., Fonseca, Natasha K. O., Manfro, Roberto C., Gonçalves, Luiz Felipe S., Leitão, Cristiane Bauermann, Souza, Gabriela C.·2014·Transplantation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effects of obesity on outcomes reported after kidney transplantation have been controversial. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to elucidate this issue. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and gray literature were searched up to August 6, 2013. Studies that compared obese and nonobese patients who underwent kidney transplantation and evaluated one of these outcomes-delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection, graft or patient survival at 1 or 5 years after transplantation, or death by cardiovascular disease (CVD)-were included. Two independent reviewers extracted the data and assessed the quality of the studies. RESULTS: From 1,973 articles retrieved, 21 studies (9,296 patients) were included. Obesity was associated with DGF (relative risk, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.57; I=8%; Pheterogeneity=0.36), but not with acute rejection. Graft loss and death were associated with obesity only in the analysis of studies that evaluated patients who received a kidney graft before year 2000. No association of obesity with graft loss and death was found in the analysis of studies that evaluated patients who received a kidney graft after year 2000. Death by CVD was associated with obesity (relative risk, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-3.64; I=0%; Pheterogeneity=0.59); however, most studies included in this analysis evaluated patients who received a kidney graft after year 2000. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, obese patients have increased risk for DGF. In the past years, obesity was a risk factor for graft loss, death by CVD, and all-cause mortality. However, for the obese transplanted patient today, the graft and patient survival is the same as that of the nonobese patient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/tp.0000000000000028

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nicoletto, B. B., Fonseca, N. K. O., Manfro, R. C., Gonçalves, L. F. S., Leitão, C. B., & Souza, G. C.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Corresponding author
Souza, Gabriela C.
Venue
Transplantation
Published
2014-07-27
Volume
98
Issue
2
Pages
167-176
ISSN
0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975824792
Cited by
193
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transplantation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Organ Donation and Transplantation
Keywords
obesity, kidney transplantation, delayed graft function, acute rejection, graft loss, patient survival, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, transplant outcomes
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Graft Rejection, Graft Survival, Humans, Obesity, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Chi-Square Distribution, Odds Ratio, Kidney Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Delayed Graft Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review