Cited by 278Organ Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesLiver Disease and TransplantationLiver Diseases and Immunity

Evolving Frequency and Outcomes of Liver Transplantation Based on Etiology of Liver Disease

Singal, Ashwani K., Guturu, Praveen, Hmoud, Bashar, Kuo, Yong-Fang, Salameh, Habeeb, Wiesner, Russell H.·2013·Transplantation

Abstract

Background In the background of availability of better treatments for specific liver diseases and listing of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) as an etiology for liver transplantation (LT), data are unclear on the impact of disease etiology on the frequency of LT and liver posttransplantation outcomes. Methods The United Network for Organ Sharing database (1994-2009) was queried for adults receiving first LT for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC; n=3052), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC; n=3854), hepatitis C virus (HCV; n=15,147), alcoholic cirrhosis (AC; n=8940), HCV+alcohol (n=6066), NASH (n=1368), cryptogenic cirrhosis (CC; n=5856), hepatitis B virus (HBV; n=1816), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; n=8588). Graft and patient survival were compared and Cox models were built to determine independent prediction of outcomes by disease etiology. Results The frequency of LT increased for NASH, HCC, and HCV+alcohol, remained stable for AC, and decreased for PBC, PSC, HCV, CC, and HBV. The proportion of simultaneous liver-kidney transplants increased from approximately 3% in 2001 to 10% in 2009. Compared with PBC, 5-year graft and patient survival were (a) similar for PSC, NASH, and HBV (80-85%), (b) poorer for AC and CC (hazard ratio, 1-1.5), and (c) worst for HCV, HCV+alcohol, and HCC (hazard ratio, 1.5-2.4). Five-year outcomes for HCV-associated HCC were poorer compared with HCC due to other etiologies. Conclusions LT performed for NASH and HCC are increasing. Potent treatm…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/tp.0b013e31827afb3a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singal, A. K., Guturu, P., Hmoud, B., Kuo, Y.-F., Salameh, H., & Wiesner, R. H.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Corresponding author
Singal, Ashwani K.
Venue
Transplantation
Published
2013-03-15
Volume
95
Issue
5
Pages
755-760
ISSN
0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2324221245
Cited by
278
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 17
FWCI
33.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transplantation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
Keywords
liver transplantation, liver disease etiology, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, hepatitis C virus, alcoholic cirrhosis, cryptogenic cirrhosis, hepatitis B virus, hepatocellular carcinoma, graft survival, patient survival, combined liver-kidney transplantation, transplant trends
MeSH terms
Adult, Fatty Liver, Graft Survival, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Liver Diseases, Liver Neoplasms, Proportional Hazards Models, Liver Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review