Cited by 63Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Coping Strategies Influence Caregiver Outcomes among Asian Family Caregivers of Persons with Dementia in Singapore

Lim, June, Griva, Konstadina, Goh, Jenny, Chionh, Hui Ling, Yap, Philip·2011·Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders

Abstract

This cross-sectional study used the stress and coping paradigm to examine the factors associated with negative and positive adjustment outcomes among Asian family caregivers of persons with dementia (PWD) in Singapore. One hundred seven family caregivers completed measures assessing patient illness characteristics, general coping styles of caregivers, specific dementia management strategies, religion and spirituality, and caregiver adjustment outcomes of burden and gain. Multiple regressions revealed that behavioral problems in the PWD, dementia severity, and the use of behavioral disengagement and criticism as coping strategies were significant predictors of burden accounting for 48% of the explained variance [F(4,99)=23.12, P<0.001]. The only significant predictor of gain was the use of encouragement as a specific dementia management strategy, explaining 18% of variance [F(3,102)=7.39, P<0.001]. Religion and spirituality predicted gain indirectly through the use of encouragement. Coping strategies had an independent effect on caregiver outcomes above and beyond PWD illness characteristics and caregiver characteristics. Hence, caregiver interventions should target coping strategies to improve outcomes of caregiving for dementia. Findings also support the need to examine religion and spirituality in future studies of caregiver adjustment outcomes and to explore the factors not measured in this study that might explain gain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wad.0b013e3181ec18ae

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lim, J., Griva, K., Goh, J., Chionh, H. L., & Yap, P.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Alexandra Hospital (SG)
Corresponding author
  • Lim, June
  • Griva, Konstadina
Venue
Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders
Published
2011-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
34-41
ISSN
0893-0341 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060607657
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Funders
National University of Singapore
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
family caregivers, dementia, coping strategies, caregiver burden, caregiver adaptation, behavioral symptoms of dementia, dementia severity, behavioral disengagement, criticism, encouragement, religion and spirituality, Singapore
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dementia, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Singapore, Caregivers, Cost of Illness, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review