Cited by 42Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsCerebrovascular and genetic disorders

Cerebral Subcortical Small Vessel Disease in Subjects With Pathologically Confirmed Alzheimer Disease: A Clinicopathologic Study in the Oxford Project to Investigate Memory and Ageing (OPTIMA)

Esiri, Margaret M., Joachim, Catharine, Sloan, Carolyn, Christie, Sharon, Agacinski, Grzegorz, Bridges, Leslie R., Wilcock, Gordon K., Smith, A. David·2014·Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders

Abstract

The understanding of how cerebrovascular disease (CVD) contributes to dementia is hampered by a lack of agreed and validated pathologic methods to accord weight to the contribution of different aspects of CVD to dementia. A previous study from the Oxford Project to Investigate Memory and Ageing (OPTIMA) validated a scheme for assessing the contribution of subcortical small vessel disease (SVD) toward dementia in the elderly by showing a significant inverse relationship between the severity of SVD and cognition in subjects without any other dementia pathology using this method. In the present paper, the method has been used to assess severity of SVD in 161 cases of neuropathologically confirmed Alzheimer disease. The results showed there was no relationship between the SVD score and cognitive scores acquired in the last 2 years of life. SVD scores were significantly related to age (P<0.0017) and were slightly but significantly higher in females than males (P<0.049). SVD scores were not related to blood pressure at entry to OPTIMA and were significantly lower when compared with the cohort of OPTIMA cases with only CVD (mean 5.06 ± 1.85 vs. 5.9 ± 2.67; P<0.0065). We conclude that when Alzheimer disease pathology is present in elderly subjects, it overwhelms the modest contribution that SVD makes to cognitive impairment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wad.0b013e31829b72f1

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Esiri, M. M., Joachim, C., Sloan, C., Christie, S., Agacinski, G., Bridges, L. R., Wilcock, G. K., & Smith, A. D.
Affiliations
  • St George's Hospital (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Esiri, Margaret M.
  • Joachim, Catharine
  • Sloan, Carolyn
Venue
Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders
Published
2014-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
30-35
ISSN
0893-0341 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040818357
Cited by
42
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MR/L022656/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, cognitive impairment, neuropathology, sex differences, blood pressure, aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review