Cited by 175Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis

Mechanisms underlying progression in multiple sclerosis

Open access
Absinta, Martina, Lassmann, Hans, Trapp, Bruce D.·2020·Current Opinion in Neurology

Abstract

Purpose of review: In multiple sclerosis, currently approved disease-modifying treatments are effective in modulating peripheral immunity, and coherently, in reducing clinical/radiological relapses, but still, they perform poorly in preventing disease progression and overall disability accrual. This review provides an up-to-date overview of the neuropathology of progressive multiple sclerosis, including a summary of the main mechanisms of disease progression. Recent findings: Clinical progression in multiple sclerosis is likely related to the accumulation of neuro-axonal loss in a lifelong inflammatory CNS environment (both adaptive and innate) and relative un-balance between damage, repair and brain functional reserve. A critical driver appears to be the T-cell and B-cell-mediated compartmentalized inflammation within the leptomeninges and within the parenchyma. Recent perspective highlighted also the role of the glial response to such lifelong inflammatory injury as the critical player for both pathological and clinical outcomes. Summary: The neuropathological and biological understanding of disease progression in multiple sclerosis have progressed in the last few years. As a consequence, new therapeutic approaches are emerging outside the modulation of T-cell activity and/or the depletion of B cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wco.0000000000000818

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Focal lesions such as those in the brainstem result in axonal loss, and cortical demyelination is associated with selective neuronal loss; both are prominent determinants of progression.

    “It is well established that focal lesions such as those in the brainstem result in axonal loss, and that cortical demyelination, which occurs independently of white matter lesions, is associated with selective neuronal loss18; both these degenerative features are prominent determinants of progression18,19.”

    From Locus for severity implicates CNS resilience in progression of multiple sclerosis (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Neuropathology of progressive MS section (page unavailable) says subpial cortical demyelination can develop independently of white-matter lesions and identifies cortical lesions as a major substrate of disability. The Final pathways section (page unavailable) reports significant cortical neuronal loss, but says neuronal loss was not correlated with cortical demyelination in the myelocortical patients discussed. It describes axonal injury in white matter, not specifically brainstem lesions, and does not establish the claimed association with selective neuronal loss. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Homozygous rs10191329 risk allele carriers demonstrated more severe MS-specific brainstem and cortical pathology, which result in axonal and neuronal degeneration respectively and drive progression.

    “Besides these clinical differences, homozygous rs10191329 risk allele carriers also demonstrated more severe MS-specific brainstem and cortical pathology, which result in axonal and neuronal degeneration respectively and drive progression18,19.”

    From Locus for severity implicates CNS resilience in progression of multiple sclerosis (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

    The 'Neuropathology of progressive MS' section links cortical lesions to disability, and 'Final pathways of neuro-axonal dysfunction and death' discusses axonal degeneration and cortical neuronal loss (page numbers unavailable). But the paper does not report that homozygous rs10191329 risk-allele carriers have more severe brainstem or cortical pathology, nor does it link brainstem pathology specifically to their axonal degeneration. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. [1]Lassmann H, Bruck W, Lucchinetti CF. The immunopathology of multiple sclerosis: an overview. Brain Pathol 2007; 17: 210– 218. 17388952 PMC8095582
  2. [3]Kutzelnigg A, Lucchinetti CF, Stadelmann C, Cortical demyelination and diffuse white matter injury in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2005; 128: 2705– 2712. 16230320
  3. [4]Calabrese M, Poretto V, Favaretto A, Cortical lesion load associates with progression of disability in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2012; 135: 2952– 2961. 23065788
  4. [5]Harrison DM, Roy S, Oh J, Association of Cortical Lesion Burden on 7-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Cognition and Disability in Multiple Sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 2015; 72: 1004– 1012. 26192316 PMC4620027
  5. [6]Magliozzi R, Reynolds R, Calabrese M. MRI of cortical lesions and its use in studying their role in MS pathogenesis and disease course. Brain Pathol 2018; 28: 735– 742. 30020563 PMC8028295
  6. [7]Frischer JM, Weigand SD, Guo Y, Clinical and pathological insights into the dynamic nature of the white matter multiple sclerosis plaque. Ann Neurol 2015; 78: 710– 721. 26239536 PMC4623970
  7. [9]Frank JA, Stone LA, Smith ME, Albert PS, Maloni H, McFarland HF. Serial contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: implications for treatment trials. Ann Neurol 1994; 36 Suppl: S86– 90. 8017894
  8. [10]Gaitan MI, Shea CD, Evangelou IE, Evolution of the blood-brain barrier in newly forming multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann Neurol 2011; 70: 22– 29. 21710622 PMC3143223
  9. [12]Bevan RJ, Evans R, Griffiths L, Meningeal inflammation and cortical demyelination in acute multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2018; 84: 829– 842. 30362156
  10. [13]Absinta M, Sati P, Schindler M, Persistent 7-tesla phase rim predicts poor outcome in new multiple sclerosis patient lesions. J Clin Invest 2016; 126: 2597– 2609. 27270171 PMC4922708
  11. [15]Absinta M, Sati P, Masuzzo F, Association of Chronic Active Multiple Sclerosis Lesions With Disability In Vivo. JAMA Neurol 2019. PMC6692692 31403674 ** This study shows that patients forming several chronic active lesions, seen on in vivo and postmortem MRI, are more likely to reach disability at younger age. Chronic active lesions are stable or expanding over 10 years due to smoldering inflammatory demyelination and axpnal degeneration at their edge, while inactive lesions overall shrink.
  12. [16]Elliott C, Belachew S, Wolinsky JS, Chronic white matter lesion activity predicts clinical progression in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 2019; 142: 2787– 2799. 31497864 PMC6736181 ** In this re-analysis of the phase III trial, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind ORATORIO study conducted in patients with primary progressive MS, longitudinal MRI evaluation of slowly expanding lesions (volume and T1-intensity), but not brain atrophy were able to predict disability worsening at week 120.
  13. [18]Patrikios P, Stadelmann C, Kutzelnigg A, Remyelination is extensive in a subset of multiple sclerosis patients. Brain 2006; 129: 3165– 3172. 16921173
  14. [19]Patani R, Balaratnam M, Vora A, Reynolds R. Remyelination can be extensive in multiple sclerosis despite a long disease course. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2007; 33: 277– 287. 17442065
  15. [20]Magliozzi R, Howell O, Vora A, Meningeal B-cell follicles in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis associate with early onset of disease and severe cortical pathology. Brain 2007; 130: 1089– 1104. 17438020
  16. [21]Trapp BD, Vignos M, Dudman J, Cortical neuronal densities and cerebral white matter demyelination in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 870– 884. 30143361 PMC6197820 ** This pathological study describes a “myelocortical” variant of MS, characterized by extensive cortical and spinal cord demyelination with none or only few small focal white matter brain plaques. This suggests that cortical demyelination and neuronal loss can develop independently from white matter lesions demyelination.
  17. [22]Magliozzi R, Howell OW, Reeves C, A Gradient of neuronal loss and meningeal inflammation in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2010; 68: 477– 493. 20976767
  18. [23]Androdias G, Reynolds R, Chanal M, Ritleng C, Confavreux C, Nataf S. Meningeal T cells associate with diffuse axonal loss in multiple sclerosis spinal cords. Ann Neurol 2010; 68: 465– 476. 20687208
  19. [24]Lassmann H Pathogenic Mechanisms Associated With Different Clinical Courses of Multiple Sclerosis. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 3116. 30687321 PMC6335289
  20. [25]Serafini B, Rosicarelli B, Magliozzi R, Stigliano E, Aloisi F. Detection of ectopic B-cell follicles with germinal centers in the meninges of patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol 2004; 14: 164– 174. 15193029 PMC8095922
  21. [26]Howell OW, Reeves CA, Nicholas R, Meningeal inflammation is widespread and linked to cortical pathology in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2011; 134: 2755– 2771. 21840891
  22. [28]Smolders J, Heutinck KM, Fransen NL, Tissue-resident memory T cells populate the human brain. Nat Commun 2018; 9: 4593. 30389931 PMC6214977
  23. [29]van Nierop GP, van Luijn MM, Michels SS, Phenotypic and functional characterization of T cells in white matter lesions of multiple sclerosis patients. Acta Neuropathol 2017; 134: 383– 401. 28624961 PMC5563341
  24. [30]Machado-Santos J, Saji E, Troscher AR, The compartmentalized inflammatory response in the multiple sclerosis brain is composed of tissue-resident CD8+ T lymphocytes and B cells. Brain 2018; 141: 2066– 2082. 29873694 PMC6022681 ** In this pathological study, the compartmentalized lymphocytic inflammatory response within autopsy MS lesions is analyzed. The Authors found that it is dominated by CD20 B-cells (some of them plasmacells) and CD8 T-cells with features of cytotoxic and tissue-resident effector memory cells. The key property of these cells is that they remain at sites of previous inflammation and get re-activated, when they again encounter their antigen.
  25. [31]Veroni C, Serafini B, Rosicarelli B, Fagnani C, Aloisi F. Transcriptional profile and Epstein-Barr virus infection status of laser-cut immune infiltrates from the brain of patients with progressive multiple sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation 2018; 15: 18. 29338732 PMC5771146
  26. [32]Serafini B, Rosicarelli B, Veroni C, Mazzola GA, Aloisi F. Epstein-Barr virus-specific CD8 T cells selectively infiltrate the multiple sclerosis brain and interact locally with virus infected cells: clue for a virus-driven immunopathological mechanism. J Virol 2019. PMC6880158 31578295
  27. [33]Konjevic Sabolek M, Held K, Beltran E, Communication of CD8(+) T cells with mononuclear phagocytes in multiple sclerosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2019; 6: 1151– 1164. 31353869 PMC6649540
  28. [34]Moll NM, Rietsch AM, Ransohoff AJ, Cortical demyelination in PML and MS: Similarities and differences. Neurology 2008; 70: 336– 343. 17914063
  29. [36]Lisak RP, Benjamins JA, Nedelkoska L, Secretory products of multiple sclerosis B cells are cytotoxic to oligodendroglia in vitro. J Neuroimmunol 2012; 246: 85– 95. 22458983
  30. [37]Lisak RP, Nedelkoska L, Benjamins JA, B cells from patients with multiple sclerosis induce cell death via apoptosis in neurons in vitro. J Neuroimmunol 2017; 309: 88– 99. 28601295
  31. [38]Magliozzi R, Howell OW, Nicholas R, Inflammatory intrathecal profiles and cortical damage in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2018; 83: 739– 755. 29518260
  32. [39]Magliozzi R, Hametner S, Facchiano F, Iron homeostasis, complement, and coagulation cascade as CSF signature of cortical lesions in early multiple sclerosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2019. PMC6856609 31675181
  33. [40]Lee NJ, Ha SK, Sati P, Spatiotemporal distribution of fibrinogen in marmoset and human inflammatory demyelination. Brain 2018; 141: 1637– 1649. 29688408 PMC5972667
  34. [41]Yates RL, Esiri MM, Palace J, Jacobs B, Perera R, DeLuca GC. Fibrin(ogen) and neurodegeneration in the progressive multiple sclerosis cortex. Ann Neurol 2017; 82: 259– 270. 28719020
  35. [42]Petersen MA, Ryu JK, Chang KJ, Fibrinogen Activates BMP Signaling in Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Cells and Inhibits Remyelination after Vascular Damage. Neuron 2017; 96: 1003– 1012 e1007. 29103804 PMC5851281
  36. [44]Dutta R, McDonough J, Yin X, Mitochondrial dysfunction as a cause of axonal degeneration in multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol 2006; 59: 478– 489. 16392116
  37. [45]Mahad D, Ziabreva I, Lassmann H, Turnbull D. Mitochondrial defects in acute multiple sclerosis lesions. Brain 2008; 131: 1722– 1735. 18515320 PMC2442422
  38. [48]Jakel S, Agirre E, Mendanha Falcao A, Altered human oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis. Nature 2019; 566: 543– 547. 30747918 PMC6544546 * Using a single-nucleus RNA-seq approach, in MS autopsy tissue, the Authors identified several clusters of oligodendrocytes, suggesting population heterogeneity and different functional states not only within MS lesions, but also in the MS normal-appearing white matter.
  39. [49]Nicaise AM, Wagstaff LJ, Willis CM, Cellular senescence in progenitor cells contributes to diminished remyelination potential in progressive multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019; 116: 9030– 9039. 30910981 PMC6500153
  40. [54]Deczkowska A, Amit I, Schwartz M. Microglial immune checkpoint mechanisms. Nat Neurosci 2018; 21: 779– 786. 29735982
  41. [55]Rothhammer V, Borucki DM, Tjon EC, Microglial control of astrocytes in response to microbial metabolites. Nature 2018; 557: 724– 728. 29769726 PMC6422159
  42. [58]Ofengeim D, Ito Y, Najafov A, Activation of necroptosis in multiple sclerosis. Cell Rep 2015; 10: 1836– 1849. 25801023 PMC4494996
  43. [61]Ofengeim D, Mazzitelli S, Ito Y, RIPK1 mediates a disease-associated microglial response in Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114: E8788– E8797. 28904096 PMC5642727
  44. [62]Mahad DH, Trapp BD, Lassmann H. Pathological mechanisms in progressive multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2015; 14: 183– 193. 25772897
  45. [63]Mahad DJ, Ziabreva I, Campbell G, Mitochondrial changes within axons in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2009; 132: 1161– 1174. 19293237 PMC3605917
  46. [64]Haider L, Zrzavy T, Hametner S, The topograpy of demyelination and neurodegeneration in the multiple sclerosis brain. Brain 2016; 139: 807– 815. 26912645 PMC4766379
  47. [66]Michailidou I, Naessens DM, Hametner S, Complement C3 on microglial clusters in multiple sclerosis occur in chronic but not acute disease: Implication for disease pathogenesis. Glia 2017; 65: 264– 277. 27778395 PMC5215693
  48. [67]Michailidou I, Willems JG, Kooi EJ, Complement C1q-C3-associated synaptic changes in multiple sclerosis hippocampus. Ann Neurol 2015; 77: 1007– 1026. 25727254
  49. [68]Ramaglia V, Hughes TR, Donev RM, C3-dependent mechanism of microglial priming relevant to multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109: 965– 970. 22219359 PMC3271873
  50. [69]Watkins LM, Neal JW, Loveless S, Complement is activated in progressive multiple sclerosis cortical grey matter lesions. J Neuroinflammation 2016; 13: 161. 27333900 PMC4918026
  51. [70]Werneburg S JJ, Kunjamma RB, Ha SK, Luciano NJ, Willis CM, Gao G, Crocker SJ, Popko B, Reich DS, Schafer DP. Targeted complement inhibition at synapses prevents microglial synaptic engulfment and synapse loss in demyelinating disease. Immunity 2019, in press. PMC6996144 31883839 * In this study, nonhuman primate and mouse MS models have been implemented to study synapse complement C3-tagging and pruning by microglia in demyelinated and non-demyelinated brain regions. In mice, complement C3-inhibition was directly able to obstacle synapses stripping from microglia.
  52. [71]Fitzgerald KC, Kim K, Smith MD, Early complement genes are associated with visual system degeneration in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2019; 142: 2722– 2736. 31289819 PMC6776113
  53. [72]Carpanini SM, Torvell M, Morgan BP. Therapeutic Inhibition of the Complement System in Diseases of the Central Nervous System. Front Immunol 2019; 10: 362. 30886620 PMC6409326

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Absinta, M., Lassmann, H., & Trapp, B. D.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Absinta, Martina
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurology
Published
2020-06
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
277-285
ISSN
  • 1350-7540 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-6551
OpenAlex
W3018930382
Cited by
175
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R35NS097303)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, disease progression, neuropathology, T cell-mediated inflammation, leptomeningeal inflammation, glial response, brain repair, disease-modifying therapy, neuroinflammation
MeSH terms
Humans, Immunologic Factors, Inflammation, Recurrence, Disease Progression, Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review