Cited by 81Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis

Models of multiple sclerosis: new insights into pathophysiology and repair

Lassmann, Hans·2008·Current Opinion in Neurology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Experimental models are indispensable in multiple sclerosis research aimed to elucidate the pathogenesis of the disease or to test new therapeutic approaches. The purpose of this review is to discuss the relevance of different models for multiple sclerosis and new insights into pathophysiology of the disease obtained from experimental studies. RECENT FINDINGS: These studies show that tissue damage in the course of brain inflammation is induced by a variety of different components of the immune system, including T cells, autoantibodies and activated effector cells, such as macrophages and microglia. In general, different mechanisms of tissue injury act in parallel and are partly counteracted by the induction of neuroprotective factors and spontaneous regenerative processes. SUMMARY: Despite this complexity, experimental studies identified bottlenecks in the destructive process, which can be targeted by therapeutic strategies. To what extent these results can be transferred into therapy of multiple sclerosis has to be shown in the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wco.0b013e3282fee94a

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EAE is often used as a model for human multiple sclerosis (MS) and to study autoreactive immune cell traffic into the CNS.

    “Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is often used as a model for human multiple sclerosis (MS) and to study autoreactive immune cell traffic into the CNS (107).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lassmann, H.
Affiliations
Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Lassmann, Hans
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurology
Published
2008-06
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
242-247
ISSN
1350-7540 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069400081
Cited by
81
References
55
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, animal models, pathophysiology, neuroinflammation, T cells, autoantibodies, macrophages, microglia, neuroprotection, tissue damage, remyelination, nerve regeneration, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Animals, Autoantibodies, Disease Models, Animal, Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental, Free Radicals, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Mitochondrial Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review