The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychogenic movement disorders
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the progress made in the area of psychogenic movement disorders (PMDs) over the past 2 years, and a simplified classification of diagnostic certainty is proposed that incorporates electrophysiological assessment. RECENT FINDINGS: Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have demonstrated altered blood flow in conversion disorders that may reflect changes in synaptic activity. Electrophysiological testing shows limitations in distinguishing between psychogenic and organic propriospinal myoclonus and dystonia. Recent evidence cautions against the uncritical acceptance of all cases of posttraumatic myoclonus and 'jumpy stump' as being organic in nature. 'Essential palatal tremor' is recognized as a rather heterogeneous group of tremors that includes psychogenic tremor. Two recent studies evaluating the long-term prognosis of psychogenic tremor differ in the degree of unfavorable outcome. Different groups of PMDs might have distinctive gait characteristics with prognostic, diagnostic, or therapeutic value. Two recent reviews provide comprehensive information on the understudied area of PMDs in children. SUMMARY: The diagnosis of PMDs should not be regarded as a diagnosis of exclusion. Careful clinical assessment is critical, and imaging or electrophysiological studies may provide important insights and confirmation of the diagnosis though some cases remain challenging and current assessments fail to provide needed clarification. Treatment is often delayed, contributing to a largely unfavorable long-term outcome. Well designed randomized control trials that validate and compare therapeutic options are urgently required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What is the Bereitschaftspotential?
Shibasaki, H., & Hallett, M. (2006) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.025 · Cited by 1,169
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL‐PET study
Whone, A. L., Watts, R. L., Stoessl, A. J., Davis, M., Reske, S., Nahmias, C., Lang, A. E., Rascol, O., Ribeiro, M. J., Remy, P., et al. (2003) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.10609 · Cited by 829
Self-citationEffect of sensory discrimination training on cortical reorganisation and phantom limb pain
Flor, H., Denke, C., Schaefer, M., & Grüsser, S. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04890-x · Cited by 560
Byl, N. N., Merzenich, M. M., & Jenkins, W. M. (1996) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.47.2.508 · Cited by 537
Neuropsychiatric aspects of Huntington’s disease.
Paulsen, J. S. (2001) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.71.3.310 · Cited by 486
Slater, E. (1965) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5447.1395 · Cited by 379
The syndrome of fixed dystonia: an evaluation of 103 patients
Schrag, A., Trimble, M., Quinn, N., & Bhatia, K. (2004) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awh262 · Cited by 345
Slater revisited: 6 year follow up study of patients with medically unexplained motor symptoms
Crimlisk, H. L., Bhatia, K., Cope, H., David, A., Marsden, C. D., & Ron, M. A. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7131.582 · Cited by 328
Dystonia and tremor induced by peripheral trauma: predisposing factors.
Jankovic, J., & Van der Linden, C. (1988) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.51.12.1512 · Cited by 261
Spence, S. A., Crimlisk, H. L., Cope, H., Ron, M. A., & Grasby, P. M. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02096-1 · Cited by 259
Cited by
A Bayesian account of ‘hysteria’
Edwards, M. J., Adams, R. A., Brown, H., Parees, I., & Friston, K. J. (2012) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aws129 · Cited by 825
Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Treatment of Functional Neurological Disorders
Espay, A. J., Aybek, S., Carson, A., Edwards, M. J., Goldstein, L. H., Hallett, M., LaFaver, K., LaFrance, W. C., Lang, A. E., Nicholson, T., et al. (2018) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1264 · Cited by 786
Self-citationFunctional neurological disorder: new subtypes and shared mechanisms
Hallett, M., Aybek, S., Dworetzky, B. A., McWhirter, L., Staab, J. P., & Stone, J. (2022) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00422-1 · Cited by 538
The involuntary nature of conversion disorder
Voon, V., Gallea, C., Hattori, N., Bruno, M., Ekanayake, V., & Hallett, M. (2010) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181ca00e9 · Cited by 335
Functional (psychogenic) movement disorders: merging mind and brain
Edwards, M. J., & Bhatia, K. P. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70310-6 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, A., & Lang, A. E.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Neurology
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 430-436
- ISSN
- 1350-7540 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068437287
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 11.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychogenic movement disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/wco.0b013e32832dc169
- The paper
- Gupta, A., & Lang, A. E. (2009). Psychogenic movement disorders. Current Opinion in Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1097/wco.0b013e32832dc169
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.